Reconsideration of Enamel Etching Protocols for Universal Adhesives

Effect of Etching Method and Etching Time

Yusuke Shimatani, Akimasa Tsujimoto, Kie Nojiri, Koji Shiratsuchi, Toshiki Takamizawa, Wayne W. Barkmeier, Mark A. Latta, Masashi Miyazaki

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether different etching methods with reduced etching times would improve the enamel bonding efficacy of universal adhesives. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three enamel etching methods were evaluated - 1. phosphoric acid ester monomer etching (PPM); 2. phosphoric acid etching (PPA); and 3. polyalkenoic acid etching (PLA) - as were three universal adhesives: 1. BeautiBond Universal (BU); 2. Prime&Bond elect (PE); and 3. Scotchbond Universal Adhesive (SU). The shear bond strengths of the universal adhesives to ground enamel and ground enamel etched for 1, 5, 10, and 15 s with different etching methods were determined after 24 h and 10,000 thermal cycles. Surface roughness average (Ra) and surface area ratio (surface area:planar area) were measured using a confocal laser scanning microscope. Field-emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM) observations of enamel with different etching protocols were also conducted. RESULTS: The bond strengths of universal adhesives to enamel subjected to PPA etching with maximum times of 1-15 s and PLA etching for 15 s were significantly higher than those to ground enamel. The bond strength to enamel subjected to PPM etching did not increase and was similar to that for ground enamel. PPA and PLA etching were effective at increasing the Ra and surface area ratio of enamel. Although both values were significantly higher than those of ground enamel, those subjected to PPA etching were significantly higher than those which underwent PLA etching. In addition, the Ra and surface area of enamel subjected to PPM etching were similar to those of ground enamel, regardless of the etching time. CONCLUSIONS: Phosphoric acid etching for <1-15 s and polyalkenoic-acid etching for 15 s both improve the bonding of universal adhesives, the Ra, and the surface area ratio of enamel. However, phosphoric acid ester monomer etching was not effective, regardless of the etching time.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)345-354
Number of pages10
JournalThe journal of adhesive dentistry
Volume21
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Dental Enamel
Adhesives
Acids
Organophosphates
Shear Strength
Lasers
Hot Temperature

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Orthodontics
  • Oral Surgery
  • Periodontics

Cite this

Reconsideration of Enamel Etching Protocols for Universal Adhesives : Effect of Etching Method and Etching Time. / Shimatani, Yusuke; Tsujimoto, Akimasa; Nojiri, Kie; Shiratsuchi, Koji; Takamizawa, Toshiki; Barkmeier, Wayne W.; Latta, Mark A.; Miyazaki, Masashi.

In: The journal of adhesive dentistry, Vol. 21, No. 4, 01.01.2019, p. 345-354.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Shimatani, Yusuke ; Tsujimoto, Akimasa ; Nojiri, Kie ; Shiratsuchi, Koji ; Takamizawa, Toshiki ; Barkmeier, Wayne W. ; Latta, Mark A. ; Miyazaki, Masashi. / Reconsideration of Enamel Etching Protocols for Universal Adhesives : Effect of Etching Method and Etching Time. In: The journal of adhesive dentistry. 2019 ; Vol. 21, No. 4. pp. 345-354.
@article{cf408b7d357643de92bc14ce4ff1d7fa,
title = "Reconsideration of Enamel Etching Protocols for Universal Adhesives: Effect of Etching Method and Etching Time",
abstract = "PURPOSE: To evaluate whether different etching methods with reduced etching times would improve the enamel bonding efficacy of universal adhesives. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three enamel etching methods were evaluated - 1. phosphoric acid ester monomer etching (PPM); 2. phosphoric acid etching (PPA); and 3. polyalkenoic acid etching (PLA) - as were three universal adhesives: 1. BeautiBond Universal (BU); 2. Prime&Bond elect (PE); and 3. Scotchbond Universal Adhesive (SU). The shear bond strengths of the universal adhesives to ground enamel and ground enamel etched for 1, 5, 10, and 15 s with different etching methods were determined after 24 h and 10,000 thermal cycles. Surface roughness average (Ra) and surface area ratio (surface area:planar area) were measured using a confocal laser scanning microscope. Field-emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM) observations of enamel with different etching protocols were also conducted. RESULTS: The bond strengths of universal adhesives to enamel subjected to PPA etching with maximum times of 1-15 s and PLA etching for 15 s were significantly higher than those to ground enamel. The bond strength to enamel subjected to PPM etching did not increase and was similar to that for ground enamel. PPA and PLA etching were effective at increasing the Ra and surface area ratio of enamel. Although both values were significantly higher than those of ground enamel, those subjected to PPA etching were significantly higher than those which underwent PLA etching. In addition, the Ra and surface area of enamel subjected to PPM etching were similar to those of ground enamel, regardless of the etching time. CONCLUSIONS: Phosphoric acid etching for <1-15 s and polyalkenoic-acid etching for 15 s both improve the bonding of universal adhesives, the Ra, and the surface area ratio of enamel. However, phosphoric acid ester monomer etching was not effective, regardless of the etching time.",
author = "Yusuke Shimatani and Akimasa Tsujimoto and Kie Nojiri and Koji Shiratsuchi and Toshiki Takamizawa and Barkmeier, {Wayne W.} and Latta, {Mark A.} and Masashi Miyazaki",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3290/j.jad.a42933",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "345--354",
journal = "Journal of Adhesive Dentistry",
issn = "1461-5185",
publisher = "Quintessence Publishing Company",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reconsideration of Enamel Etching Protocols for Universal Adhesives

T2 - Effect of Etching Method and Etching Time

AU - Shimatani, Yusuke

AU - Tsujimoto, Akimasa

AU - Nojiri, Kie

AU - Shiratsuchi, Koji

AU - Takamizawa, Toshiki

AU - Barkmeier, Wayne W.

AU - Latta, Mark A.

AU - Miyazaki, Masashi

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - PURPOSE: To evaluate whether different etching methods with reduced etching times would improve the enamel bonding efficacy of universal adhesives. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three enamel etching methods were evaluated - 1. phosphoric acid ester monomer etching (PPM); 2. phosphoric acid etching (PPA); and 3. polyalkenoic acid etching (PLA) - as were three universal adhesives: 1. BeautiBond Universal (BU); 2. Prime&Bond elect (PE); and 3. Scotchbond Universal Adhesive (SU). The shear bond strengths of the universal adhesives to ground enamel and ground enamel etched for 1, 5, 10, and 15 s with different etching methods were determined after 24 h and 10,000 thermal cycles. Surface roughness average (Ra) and surface area ratio (surface area:planar area) were measured using a confocal laser scanning microscope. Field-emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM) observations of enamel with different etching protocols were also conducted. RESULTS: The bond strengths of universal adhesives to enamel subjected to PPA etching with maximum times of 1-15 s and PLA etching for 15 s were significantly higher than those to ground enamel. The bond strength to enamel subjected to PPM etching did not increase and was similar to that for ground enamel. PPA and PLA etching were effective at increasing the Ra and surface area ratio of enamel. Although both values were significantly higher than those of ground enamel, those subjected to PPA etching were significantly higher than those which underwent PLA etching. In addition, the Ra and surface area of enamel subjected to PPM etching were similar to those of ground enamel, regardless of the etching time. CONCLUSIONS: Phosphoric acid etching for <1-15 s and polyalkenoic-acid etching for 15 s both improve the bonding of universal adhesives, the Ra, and the surface area ratio of enamel. However, phosphoric acid ester monomer etching was not effective, regardless of the etching time.

AB - PURPOSE: To evaluate whether different etching methods with reduced etching times would improve the enamel bonding efficacy of universal adhesives. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three enamel etching methods were evaluated - 1. phosphoric acid ester monomer etching (PPM); 2. phosphoric acid etching (PPA); and 3. polyalkenoic acid etching (PLA) - as were three universal adhesives: 1. BeautiBond Universal (BU); 2. Prime&Bond elect (PE); and 3. Scotchbond Universal Adhesive (SU). The shear bond strengths of the universal adhesives to ground enamel and ground enamel etched for 1, 5, 10, and 15 s with different etching methods were determined after 24 h and 10,000 thermal cycles. Surface roughness average (Ra) and surface area ratio (surface area:planar area) were measured using a confocal laser scanning microscope. Field-emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM) observations of enamel with different etching protocols were also conducted. RESULTS: The bond strengths of universal adhesives to enamel subjected to PPA etching with maximum times of 1-15 s and PLA etching for 15 s were significantly higher than those to ground enamel. The bond strength to enamel subjected to PPM etching did not increase and was similar to that for ground enamel. PPA and PLA etching were effective at increasing the Ra and surface area ratio of enamel. Although both values were significantly higher than those of ground enamel, those subjected to PPA etching were significantly higher than those which underwent PLA etching. In addition, the Ra and surface area of enamel subjected to PPM etching were similar to those of ground enamel, regardless of the etching time. CONCLUSIONS: Phosphoric acid etching for <1-15 s and polyalkenoic-acid etching for 15 s both improve the bonding of universal adhesives, the Ra, and the surface area ratio of enamel. However, phosphoric acid ester monomer etching was not effective, regardless of the etching time.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071778908&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85071778908&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3290/j.jad.a42933

DO - 10.3290/j.jad.a42933

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 345

EP - 354

JO - Journal of Adhesive Dentistry

JF - Journal of Adhesive Dentistry

SN - 1461-5185

IS - 4

ER -