Regressive effects of regulation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Regulation of health and safety has placed an unacknowledged burden on low-income households and workers. Billions of dollars are spent every year on regulations that seek to reduce life-threatening risks that arise from auto travel, air travel, air and water pollution, food, drugs and construction; the list goes on. Today, some form of regulation affects nearly every aspect of our lives (Shleifer, in: Kessler (ed) Regulation vs. litigation: perspectives from economics and law, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2010). All of the regulatory rules ostensibly intend to make consumers or workers better off, but the cost of regulation usually is borne by the same consumers and workers, reducing their ranges of choice; it therefore crowds out private spending. The crowding out effect can be particularly detrimental for low-income households. This special issue explores the various ways in which regulation may have such regressive effects as well as the political determinants of how regulation, despite its unfavorable consequences for low-income households, may come about.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalPublic Choice
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

regulation
low income
worker
private spending
travel
crowding out
water pollution
air pollution
dollar
air
determinants
food
drug
Law
costs
health
economics
Low income
Household
Workers

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

Regressive effects of regulation. / Thomas, Diana W.

In: Public Choice, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d0d4c96fa3e84f01b464b8dcf385655e,
title = "Regressive effects of regulation",
abstract = "Regulation of health and safety has placed an unacknowledged burden on low-income households and workers. Billions of dollars are spent every year on regulations that seek to reduce life-threatening risks that arise from auto travel, air travel, air and water pollution, food, drugs and construction; the list goes on. Today, some form of regulation affects nearly every aspect of our lives (Shleifer, in: Kessler (ed) Regulation vs. litigation: perspectives from economics and law, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2010). All of the regulatory rules ostensibly intend to make consumers or workers better off, but the cost of regulation usually is borne by the same consumers and workers, reducing their ranges of choice; it therefore crowds out private spending. The crowding out effect can be particularly detrimental for low-income households. This special issue explores the various ways in which regulation may have such regressive effects as well as the political determinants of how regulation, despite its unfavorable consequences for low-income households, may come about.",
author = "Thomas, {Diana W.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11127-018-00634-8",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Public Choice",
issn = "0048-5829",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Regressive effects of regulation

AU - Thomas, Diana W.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Regulation of health and safety has placed an unacknowledged burden on low-income households and workers. Billions of dollars are spent every year on regulations that seek to reduce life-threatening risks that arise from auto travel, air travel, air and water pollution, food, drugs and construction; the list goes on. Today, some form of regulation affects nearly every aspect of our lives (Shleifer, in: Kessler (ed) Regulation vs. litigation: perspectives from economics and law, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2010). All of the regulatory rules ostensibly intend to make consumers or workers better off, but the cost of regulation usually is borne by the same consumers and workers, reducing their ranges of choice; it therefore crowds out private spending. The crowding out effect can be particularly detrimental for low-income households. This special issue explores the various ways in which regulation may have such regressive effects as well as the political determinants of how regulation, despite its unfavorable consequences for low-income households, may come about.

AB - Regulation of health and safety has placed an unacknowledged burden on low-income households and workers. Billions of dollars are spent every year on regulations that seek to reduce life-threatening risks that arise from auto travel, air travel, air and water pollution, food, drugs and construction; the list goes on. Today, some form of regulation affects nearly every aspect of our lives (Shleifer, in: Kessler (ed) Regulation vs. litigation: perspectives from economics and law, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2010). All of the regulatory rules ostensibly intend to make consumers or workers better off, but the cost of regulation usually is borne by the same consumers and workers, reducing their ranges of choice; it therefore crowds out private spending. The crowding out effect can be particularly detrimental for low-income households. This special issue explores the various ways in which regulation may have such regressive effects as well as the political determinants of how regulation, despite its unfavorable consequences for low-income households, may come about.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060249584&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85060249584&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11127-018-00634-8

DO - 10.1007/s11127-018-00634-8

M3 - Article

JO - Public Choice

JF - Public Choice

SN - 0048-5829

ER -