Abstract
Objective: A survey was undertaken to categorize the materials used for the restoration of endodontic access openings through complete-coverage crowns after completion of nonsurgical root canal treatment. Method and materials: The survey package consisted of a cover letter stating instructions, rationale, and purpose for the questionnaire, a questionnaire of 8 short-answer questions, and a stamped, self-addressed envelope. A randomized sample of active dentists (300 general practitioners, 300 prosthodontists, and 300 endodontists), was selected. Collected data were analyzed with the chi-square analysis. Results: Most general practitioners (93%), endodontists (61%), and prosthodontists (75%) reported that they frequently or always permanently restore teeth after nonsurgical root canal treatment. Empress was the all-ceramic system used most commonly by prosthodontists (42%) and general practitioners (38%). A statistically significant difference in restorative material preference was found (P <0.0001), depending on the type of crown used. Conclusion: Amalgam alone and in combination with bonding agents are materials of choice for restoration of access openings through all-metal complete crowns, while resin composite is the choice for all types of complete crowns involving porcelain. Endodontists preferred "other" materials.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 719-728 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Quintessence International |
| Volume | 31 |
| Issue number | 10 |
| State | Published - Nov 2000 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Dentistry(all)
Cite this
Restoring teeth that are endodontically treated through existing crowns. Part II : Survey of restorative materials commonly used. / Trautmann, Glenn; Gutmann, James L.; Nunn, Martha E.; Witherspoon, David E.; Shulman, Jay D.
In: Quintessence International, Vol. 31, No. 10, 11.2000, p. 719-728.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Restoring teeth that are endodontically treated through existing crowns. Part II
T2 - Survey of restorative materials commonly used
AU - Trautmann, Glenn
AU - Gutmann, James L.
AU - Nunn, Martha E.
AU - Witherspoon, David E.
AU - Shulman, Jay D.
PY - 2000/11
Y1 - 2000/11
N2 - Objective: A survey was undertaken to categorize the materials used for the restoration of endodontic access openings through complete-coverage crowns after completion of nonsurgical root canal treatment. Method and materials: The survey package consisted of a cover letter stating instructions, rationale, and purpose for the questionnaire, a questionnaire of 8 short-answer questions, and a stamped, self-addressed envelope. A randomized sample of active dentists (300 general practitioners, 300 prosthodontists, and 300 endodontists), was selected. Collected data were analyzed with the chi-square analysis. Results: Most general practitioners (93%), endodontists (61%), and prosthodontists (75%) reported that they frequently or always permanently restore teeth after nonsurgical root canal treatment. Empress was the all-ceramic system used most commonly by prosthodontists (42%) and general practitioners (38%). A statistically significant difference in restorative material preference was found (P <0.0001), depending on the type of crown used. Conclusion: Amalgam alone and in combination with bonding agents are materials of choice for restoration of access openings through all-metal complete crowns, while resin composite is the choice for all types of complete crowns involving porcelain. Endodontists preferred "other" materials.
AB - Objective: A survey was undertaken to categorize the materials used for the restoration of endodontic access openings through complete-coverage crowns after completion of nonsurgical root canal treatment. Method and materials: The survey package consisted of a cover letter stating instructions, rationale, and purpose for the questionnaire, a questionnaire of 8 short-answer questions, and a stamped, self-addressed envelope. A randomized sample of active dentists (300 general practitioners, 300 prosthodontists, and 300 endodontists), was selected. Collected data were analyzed with the chi-square analysis. Results: Most general practitioners (93%), endodontists (61%), and prosthodontists (75%) reported that they frequently or always permanently restore teeth after nonsurgical root canal treatment. Empress was the all-ceramic system used most commonly by prosthodontists (42%) and general practitioners (38%). A statistically significant difference in restorative material preference was found (P <0.0001), depending on the type of crown used. Conclusion: Amalgam alone and in combination with bonding agents are materials of choice for restoration of access openings through all-metal complete crowns, while resin composite is the choice for all types of complete crowns involving porcelain. Endodontists preferred "other" materials.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034328440&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034328440&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
C2 - 11203999
AN - SCOPUS:0034328440
VL - 31
SP - 719
EP - 728
JO - Quintessence International
JF - Quintessence International
SN - 0033-6572
IS - 10
ER -