Abstract
Sexually violent predator (SVP) laws use the civil commitment process to confine mentally disordered and dangerous offenders who are at high risk to reoffend. Few studies have examined how jurors decide SVP cases. As a result, a pilot study and three experimental studies were conducted, in which victim type, risk communication, and juror education were manipulated to assess juror response. Results continually illustrated that victim type was the most salient manipulation across studies and that the manner of risk communication and juror education had little impact on jurors.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 322-336 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Behavioral Sciences and the Law |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - May 2010 |
Fingerprint
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Law
- Clinical Psychology
- Psychiatry and Mental health
- Medicine(all)
Cite this
Risk communication in sexually violent predator hearings. / Huss, Matthew T.; Scott, Sarah; Gilcrist, Brett; Thurston, Nicole.
In: Behavioral Sciences and the Law, Vol. 28, No. 3, 05.2010, p. 322-336.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Risk communication in sexually violent predator hearings
AU - Huss, Matthew T.
AU - Scott, Sarah
AU - Gilcrist, Brett
AU - Thurston, Nicole
PY - 2010/5
Y1 - 2010/5
N2 - Sexually violent predator (SVP) laws use the civil commitment process to confine mentally disordered and dangerous offenders who are at high risk to reoffend. Few studies have examined how jurors decide SVP cases. As a result, a pilot study and three experimental studies were conducted, in which victim type, risk communication, and juror education were manipulated to assess juror response. Results continually illustrated that victim type was the most salient manipulation across studies and that the manner of risk communication and juror education had little impact on jurors.
AB - Sexually violent predator (SVP) laws use the civil commitment process to confine mentally disordered and dangerous offenders who are at high risk to reoffend. Few studies have examined how jurors decide SVP cases. As a result, a pilot study and three experimental studies were conducted, in which victim type, risk communication, and juror education were manipulated to assess juror response. Results continually illustrated that victim type was the most salient manipulation across studies and that the manner of risk communication and juror education had little impact on jurors.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77955706833&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77955706833&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/bsl.903
DO - 10.1002/bsl.903
M3 - Article
C2 - 19908210
AN - SCOPUS:77955706833
VL - 28
SP - 322
EP - 336
JO - Behavioral Sciences and the Law
JF - Behavioral Sciences and the Law
SN - 0735-3936
IS - 3
ER -