Risk factors for noncompliance with glaucoma follow-up visits in a residents' eye clinic

Omofolasade Kosoko-Lasaki, Harry A. Quigley, Susan Vitale, Cheryl Enger, Lisa Kerrigan, James M. Tielsch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to identify factors associated with compliance with glaucoma follow-up visits. Design: Computer records of a university residents' eye clinic were reviewed to identify a random sample of all persons who had an examination with International Classification of Disease (ICD) 9 coding (ICD9) for glaucoma suspect or glaucoma during a 2-year period (1991-1993) to undergo telephone interview. Participants: Those who were seen at least every 6 months regardless of earlier return instructions were defined as compliant with follow-up (controls n = 362). Those who had any lapse between visits of longer than 6 months were defined as noncompliant (cases, n = 362). Results: Interviews were completed for 196 cases and 242 controls. Noncompliant persons were significantly more likely to be suspects for glaucoma rather than have definite glaucoma and to be dissatisfied with waiting time in the clinic (29.1% vs. 17.8%, P <0.005) and to state that they did not take their glaucoma medications as prescribed (25.4% vs. 13.4%, P <0.004). They also were less likely to have been prescribed eyedrop medication. A high percentage of both patients and controls knew that glaucoma can lead to blindness (85.2% and 88.4%, respectively). The most common reasons patients gave for not keeping follow-up visits were the perception that their eye problem was 'not serious enough', the cost of examinations, and that the doctor did not tell them to come back. Conclusion: Compliance with follow-up visits for glaucoma is associated with markers for early disease. Attempts to improve compliance might focus on improved communication of the seriousness of the disease and improvements in clinic waiting time.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)62
Number of pages1
JournalJournal of Community Eye Health
Volume11
Issue number28
StatePublished - 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Glaucoma
Ocular Hypertension
Interviews
Ophthalmic Solutions
International Classification of Diseases
Blindness
Compliance
Communication
Costs and Cost Analysis

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Kosoko-Lasaki, O., Quigley, H. A., Vitale, S., Enger, C., Kerrigan, L., & Tielsch, J. M. (1998). Risk factors for noncompliance with glaucoma follow-up visits in a residents' eye clinic. Journal of Community Eye Health, 11(28), 62.

Risk factors for noncompliance with glaucoma follow-up visits in a residents' eye clinic. / Kosoko-Lasaki, Omofolasade; Quigley, Harry A.; Vitale, Susan; Enger, Cheryl; Kerrigan, Lisa; Tielsch, James M.

In: Journal of Community Eye Health, Vol. 11, No. 28, 1998, p. 62.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kosoko-Lasaki, O, Quigley, HA, Vitale, S, Enger, C, Kerrigan, L & Tielsch, JM 1998, 'Risk factors for noncompliance with glaucoma follow-up visits in a residents' eye clinic', Journal of Community Eye Health, vol. 11, no. 28, pp. 62.
Kosoko-Lasaki, Omofolasade ; Quigley, Harry A. ; Vitale, Susan ; Enger, Cheryl ; Kerrigan, Lisa ; Tielsch, James M. / Risk factors for noncompliance with glaucoma follow-up visits in a residents' eye clinic. In: Journal of Community Eye Health. 1998 ; Vol. 11, No. 28. pp. 62.
@article{0022e8d8c95b4b98a1945a186cfbcb5c,
title = "Risk factors for noncompliance with glaucoma follow-up visits in a residents' eye clinic",
abstract = "Objective: This study aimed to identify factors associated with compliance with glaucoma follow-up visits. Design: Computer records of a university residents' eye clinic were reviewed to identify a random sample of all persons who had an examination with International Classification of Disease (ICD) 9 coding (ICD9) for glaucoma suspect or glaucoma during a 2-year period (1991-1993) to undergo telephone interview. Participants: Those who were seen at least every 6 months regardless of earlier return instructions were defined as compliant with follow-up (controls n = 362). Those who had any lapse between visits of longer than 6 months were defined as noncompliant (cases, n = 362). Results: Interviews were completed for 196 cases and 242 controls. Noncompliant persons were significantly more likely to be suspects for glaucoma rather than have definite glaucoma and to be dissatisfied with waiting time in the clinic (29.1{\%} vs. 17.8{\%}, P <0.005) and to state that they did not take their glaucoma medications as prescribed (25.4{\%} vs. 13.4{\%}, P <0.004). They also were less likely to have been prescribed eyedrop medication. A high percentage of both patients and controls knew that glaucoma can lead to blindness (85.2{\%} and 88.4{\%}, respectively). The most common reasons patients gave for not keeping follow-up visits were the perception that their eye problem was 'not serious enough', the cost of examinations, and that the doctor did not tell them to come back. Conclusion: Compliance with follow-up visits for glaucoma is associated with markers for early disease. Attempts to improve compliance might focus on improved communication of the seriousness of the disease and improvements in clinic waiting time.",
author = "Omofolasade Kosoko-Lasaki and Quigley, {Harry A.} and Susan Vitale and Cheryl Enger and Lisa Kerrigan and Tielsch, {James M.}",
year = "1998",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "62",
journal = "Community Eye Health Journal",
issn = "0953-6833",
publisher = "International Centre for Eye Health",
number = "28",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Risk factors for noncompliance with glaucoma follow-up visits in a residents' eye clinic

AU - Kosoko-Lasaki, Omofolasade

AU - Quigley, Harry A.

AU - Vitale, Susan

AU - Enger, Cheryl

AU - Kerrigan, Lisa

AU - Tielsch, James M.

PY - 1998

Y1 - 1998

N2 - Objective: This study aimed to identify factors associated with compliance with glaucoma follow-up visits. Design: Computer records of a university residents' eye clinic were reviewed to identify a random sample of all persons who had an examination with International Classification of Disease (ICD) 9 coding (ICD9) for glaucoma suspect or glaucoma during a 2-year period (1991-1993) to undergo telephone interview. Participants: Those who were seen at least every 6 months regardless of earlier return instructions were defined as compliant with follow-up (controls n = 362). Those who had any lapse between visits of longer than 6 months were defined as noncompliant (cases, n = 362). Results: Interviews were completed for 196 cases and 242 controls. Noncompliant persons were significantly more likely to be suspects for glaucoma rather than have definite glaucoma and to be dissatisfied with waiting time in the clinic (29.1% vs. 17.8%, P <0.005) and to state that they did not take their glaucoma medications as prescribed (25.4% vs. 13.4%, P <0.004). They also were less likely to have been prescribed eyedrop medication. A high percentage of both patients and controls knew that glaucoma can lead to blindness (85.2% and 88.4%, respectively). The most common reasons patients gave for not keeping follow-up visits were the perception that their eye problem was 'not serious enough', the cost of examinations, and that the doctor did not tell them to come back. Conclusion: Compliance with follow-up visits for glaucoma is associated with markers for early disease. Attempts to improve compliance might focus on improved communication of the seriousness of the disease and improvements in clinic waiting time.

AB - Objective: This study aimed to identify factors associated with compliance with glaucoma follow-up visits. Design: Computer records of a university residents' eye clinic were reviewed to identify a random sample of all persons who had an examination with International Classification of Disease (ICD) 9 coding (ICD9) for glaucoma suspect or glaucoma during a 2-year period (1991-1993) to undergo telephone interview. Participants: Those who were seen at least every 6 months regardless of earlier return instructions were defined as compliant with follow-up (controls n = 362). Those who had any lapse between visits of longer than 6 months were defined as noncompliant (cases, n = 362). Results: Interviews were completed for 196 cases and 242 controls. Noncompliant persons were significantly more likely to be suspects for glaucoma rather than have definite glaucoma and to be dissatisfied with waiting time in the clinic (29.1% vs. 17.8%, P <0.005) and to state that they did not take their glaucoma medications as prescribed (25.4% vs. 13.4%, P <0.004). They also were less likely to have been prescribed eyedrop medication. A high percentage of both patients and controls knew that glaucoma can lead to blindness (85.2% and 88.4%, respectively). The most common reasons patients gave for not keeping follow-up visits were the perception that their eye problem was 'not serious enough', the cost of examinations, and that the doctor did not tell them to come back. Conclusion: Compliance with follow-up visits for glaucoma is associated with markers for early disease. Attempts to improve compliance might focus on improved communication of the seriousness of the disease and improvements in clinic waiting time.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=54749135460&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=54749135460&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 62

JO - Community Eye Health Journal

JF - Community Eye Health Journal

SN - 0953-6833

IS - 28

ER -