Social cognitive correlates of attitudes toward empirically supported treatments

Laura D. Seligman, Joseph D. Hovey, Gabriela Hurtado, Erin F. Swedish, Michelle E. Roley, Andrew L. Geers, Prachi Kene, Jon D. Elhai, Thomas H. Ollendick

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations


Many clinicians report less than favorable attitudes regarding the use of Empirically Supported Treatments (ESTs). To better understand attitudes toward ESTs we examined the relationship among social-cognitive factors, career choices, and attitudes toward ESTs. Mental health professionals completed measures assessing need for cognition (NFC), decision-making style, career interests, and attitudes toward ESTs. Participants who reported spending the majority of their time in clinical practice reported significantly less favorable attitudes toward ESTs, a more intuitive decision-making style, and lower NFC than those spending the majority of their time doing research. Higher intuition and lower NFC were associated with less favorable attitudes toward ESTs. Moderation analyses testing the hypothesis that decision-making style and NFC would moderate the effects of career status on attitudes approached significance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)215-223
Number of pages9
JournalProfessional Psychology: Research and Practice
Issue number3
StatePublished - 2016
Externally publishedYes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Psychology(all)


Dive into the research topics of 'Social cognitive correlates of attitudes toward empirically supported treatments'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this