Social psychology and problem-solving courts

Judicial roles and decision making

Richard L. Wiener, Leah Georges

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

For many who suffer from mental illness or substance abuse, and even for some who are perpetrators of family violence, the criminal justice system has become a dumping ground. After the courts adjudicate these offenders and they serve their punishments, they frequently recidivate and return to the criminal courts with new charges. This chapter describes problem-solving courts as an alternative to the criminal courts that address the revolving door problem. This chapter describes a legal decision-making model that explains how offenders react to problem-solving courts and suggests ways to study both the theory and outcome of drug courts, mental health courts, domestic violence courts, and veteran courts. The model discusses an alternative to the rational actor approach to punishment that problem-solving courts endorse and describes the roles of anticipated emotion, motivation, and perceptions of procedural justice in understanding the reactions of offenders in these courts. This chapter ends with a taxonomy of problem-solving courts, which focuses on the role of the judge as a facilitator versus arbitrator and the type of legal decision-making model that the courts assume (psychological model versus and economic model). The first dimensions examines the different approaches that judges take in criminal and problem-solving courts and the second compares a psychological model of judgment to a utility maximization approach to decision-making theory. This chapter ends with an analysis of the different types of courts that occupy different locations in the four quadrants of the taxonomy and spells out implications for the consumers in these different institutions.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProblem Solving Courts: Social Science and Legal Perspectives
PublisherSpringer New York
Pages1-20
Number of pages20
Volume9781461474036
ISBN (Electronic)9781461474036
ISBN (Print)1461474027, 9781461474029
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Judicial Role
Social Psychology
Social Problems
social psychology
Decision Making
decision making
Psychological Models
Domestic Violence
Punishment
Decision Theory
Economic Models
Criminal Law
Social Justice
Veterans
Substance-Related Disorders
Motivation
offender
Mental Health
Emotions
taxonomy

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Psychology(all)
  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Wiener, R. L., & Georges, L. (2013). Social psychology and problem-solving courts: Judicial roles and decision making. In Problem Solving Courts: Social Science and Legal Perspectives (Vol. 9781461474036, pp. 1-20). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7403-6-1

Social psychology and problem-solving courts : Judicial roles and decision making. / Wiener, Richard L.; Georges, Leah.

Problem Solving Courts: Social Science and Legal Perspectives. Vol. 9781461474036 Springer New York, 2013. p. 1-20.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Wiener, RL & Georges, L 2013, Social psychology and problem-solving courts: Judicial roles and decision making. in Problem Solving Courts: Social Science and Legal Perspectives. vol. 9781461474036, Springer New York, pp. 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7403-6-1
Wiener RL, Georges L. Social psychology and problem-solving courts: Judicial roles and decision making. In Problem Solving Courts: Social Science and Legal Perspectives. Vol. 9781461474036. Springer New York. 2013. p. 1-20 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7403-6-1
Wiener, Richard L. ; Georges, Leah. / Social psychology and problem-solving courts : Judicial roles and decision making. Problem Solving Courts: Social Science and Legal Perspectives. Vol. 9781461474036 Springer New York, 2013. pp. 1-20
@inbook{19baec90471b48e083de1861d3015048,
title = "Social psychology and problem-solving courts: Judicial roles and decision making",
abstract = "For many who suffer from mental illness or substance abuse, and even for some who are perpetrators of family violence, the criminal justice system has become a dumping ground. After the courts adjudicate these offenders and they serve their punishments, they frequently recidivate and return to the criminal courts with new charges. This chapter describes problem-solving courts as an alternative to the criminal courts that address the revolving door problem. This chapter describes a legal decision-making model that explains how offenders react to problem-solving courts and suggests ways to study both the theory and outcome of drug courts, mental health courts, domestic violence courts, and veteran courts. The model discusses an alternative to the rational actor approach to punishment that problem-solving courts endorse and describes the roles of anticipated emotion, motivation, and perceptions of procedural justice in understanding the reactions of offenders in these courts. This chapter ends with a taxonomy of problem-solving courts, which focuses on the role of the judge as a facilitator versus arbitrator and the type of legal decision-making model that the courts assume (psychological model versus and economic model). The first dimensions examines the different approaches that judges take in criminal and problem-solving courts and the second compares a psychological model of judgment to a utility maximization approach to decision-making theory. This chapter ends with an analysis of the different types of courts that occupy different locations in the four quadrants of the taxonomy and spells out implications for the consumers in these different institutions.",
author = "Wiener, {Richard L.} and Leah Georges",
year = "2013",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/978-1-4614-7403-6-1",
language = "English",
isbn = "1461474027",
volume = "9781461474036",
pages = "1--20",
booktitle = "Problem Solving Courts: Social Science and Legal Perspectives",
publisher = "Springer New York",
address = "United States",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Social psychology and problem-solving courts

T2 - Judicial roles and decision making

AU - Wiener, Richard L.

AU - Georges, Leah

PY - 2013/3/1

Y1 - 2013/3/1

N2 - For many who suffer from mental illness or substance abuse, and even for some who are perpetrators of family violence, the criminal justice system has become a dumping ground. After the courts adjudicate these offenders and they serve their punishments, they frequently recidivate and return to the criminal courts with new charges. This chapter describes problem-solving courts as an alternative to the criminal courts that address the revolving door problem. This chapter describes a legal decision-making model that explains how offenders react to problem-solving courts and suggests ways to study both the theory and outcome of drug courts, mental health courts, domestic violence courts, and veteran courts. The model discusses an alternative to the rational actor approach to punishment that problem-solving courts endorse and describes the roles of anticipated emotion, motivation, and perceptions of procedural justice in understanding the reactions of offenders in these courts. This chapter ends with a taxonomy of problem-solving courts, which focuses on the role of the judge as a facilitator versus arbitrator and the type of legal decision-making model that the courts assume (psychological model versus and economic model). The first dimensions examines the different approaches that judges take in criminal and problem-solving courts and the second compares a psychological model of judgment to a utility maximization approach to decision-making theory. This chapter ends with an analysis of the different types of courts that occupy different locations in the four quadrants of the taxonomy and spells out implications for the consumers in these different institutions.

AB - For many who suffer from mental illness or substance abuse, and even for some who are perpetrators of family violence, the criminal justice system has become a dumping ground. After the courts adjudicate these offenders and they serve their punishments, they frequently recidivate and return to the criminal courts with new charges. This chapter describes problem-solving courts as an alternative to the criminal courts that address the revolving door problem. This chapter describes a legal decision-making model that explains how offenders react to problem-solving courts and suggests ways to study both the theory and outcome of drug courts, mental health courts, domestic violence courts, and veteran courts. The model discusses an alternative to the rational actor approach to punishment that problem-solving courts endorse and describes the roles of anticipated emotion, motivation, and perceptions of procedural justice in understanding the reactions of offenders in these courts. This chapter ends with a taxonomy of problem-solving courts, which focuses on the role of the judge as a facilitator versus arbitrator and the type of legal decision-making model that the courts assume (psychological model versus and economic model). The first dimensions examines the different approaches that judges take in criminal and problem-solving courts and the second compares a psychological model of judgment to a utility maximization approach to decision-making theory. This chapter ends with an analysis of the different types of courts that occupy different locations in the four quadrants of the taxonomy and spells out implications for the consumers in these different institutions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930435691&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84930435691&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-1-4614-7403-6-1

DO - 10.1007/978-1-4614-7403-6-1

M3 - Chapter

SN - 1461474027

SN - 9781461474029

VL - 9781461474036

SP - 1

EP - 20

BT - Problem Solving Courts: Social Science and Legal Perspectives

PB - Springer New York

ER -