Sport, religious belief, and religious diversity

Randolph M. Feezell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this paper I examine some issues raised by conspicuous displays of religiosity in sports. In particular, important questions have been occasioned by the relatively recent pronouncements and behavior of a celebrated evangelical Christian athlete in American professional football. I explain reasons why some find such conspicuous piety worrisome. I raise concerns related to the nature of sport, consistency, divisiveness, trivialization, and religious diversity. After discussing objections to exclusivist forms of religion, especially theistic religions, I focus on how religious beliefs should be held. I present what I call the Basic Argument from Religious Disagreement, whose conclusion claims that religious beliefs ought to be held fallibly, rather than confidently or with certainty. Fallible religious belief has important and valuable consequences, overall and in the specific context of sports. Celebrated athletes have strong reasons to hold religious beliefs fallibly and, if they claim to be role models, they may have epistemic responsibilities as well as moral responsibilities.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)135-162
Number of pages28
JournalJournal of the Philosophy of Sport
Volume40
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2013

Fingerprint

Religion
Sports
athlete
responsibility
role model
Athletes
Football

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Health(social science)

Cite this

Sport, religious belief, and religious diversity. / Feezell, Randolph M.

In: Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, Vol. 40, No. 1, 01.05.2013, p. 135-162.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Feezell, Randolph M. / Sport, religious belief, and religious diversity. In: Journal of the Philosophy of Sport. 2013 ; Vol. 40, No. 1. pp. 135-162.
@article{d9c203e732b5491f938536059373aca5,
title = "Sport, religious belief, and religious diversity",
abstract = "In this paper I examine some issues raised by conspicuous displays of religiosity in sports. In particular, important questions have been occasioned by the relatively recent pronouncements and behavior of a celebrated evangelical Christian athlete in American professional football. I explain reasons why some find such conspicuous piety worrisome. I raise concerns related to the nature of sport, consistency, divisiveness, trivialization, and religious diversity. After discussing objections to exclusivist forms of religion, especially theistic religions, I focus on how religious beliefs should be held. I present what I call the Basic Argument from Religious Disagreement, whose conclusion claims that religious beliefs ought to be held fallibly, rather than confidently or with certainty. Fallible religious belief has important and valuable consequences, overall and in the specific context of sports. Celebrated athletes have strong reasons to hold religious beliefs fallibly and, if they claim to be role models, they may have epistemic responsibilities as well as moral responsibilities.",
author = "Feezell, {Randolph M.}",
year = "2013",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/00948705.2013.785423",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "135--162",
journal = "Journal of the Philosophy of Sport",
issn = "0094-8705",
publisher = "Human Kinetics Publishers Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sport, religious belief, and religious diversity

AU - Feezell, Randolph M.

PY - 2013/5/1

Y1 - 2013/5/1

N2 - In this paper I examine some issues raised by conspicuous displays of religiosity in sports. In particular, important questions have been occasioned by the relatively recent pronouncements and behavior of a celebrated evangelical Christian athlete in American professional football. I explain reasons why some find such conspicuous piety worrisome. I raise concerns related to the nature of sport, consistency, divisiveness, trivialization, and religious diversity. After discussing objections to exclusivist forms of religion, especially theistic religions, I focus on how religious beliefs should be held. I present what I call the Basic Argument from Religious Disagreement, whose conclusion claims that religious beliefs ought to be held fallibly, rather than confidently or with certainty. Fallible religious belief has important and valuable consequences, overall and in the specific context of sports. Celebrated athletes have strong reasons to hold religious beliefs fallibly and, if they claim to be role models, they may have epistemic responsibilities as well as moral responsibilities.

AB - In this paper I examine some issues raised by conspicuous displays of religiosity in sports. In particular, important questions have been occasioned by the relatively recent pronouncements and behavior of a celebrated evangelical Christian athlete in American professional football. I explain reasons why some find such conspicuous piety worrisome. I raise concerns related to the nature of sport, consistency, divisiveness, trivialization, and religious diversity. After discussing objections to exclusivist forms of religion, especially theistic religions, I focus on how religious beliefs should be held. I present what I call the Basic Argument from Religious Disagreement, whose conclusion claims that religious beliefs ought to be held fallibly, rather than confidently or with certainty. Fallible religious belief has important and valuable consequences, overall and in the specific context of sports. Celebrated athletes have strong reasons to hold religious beliefs fallibly and, if they claim to be role models, they may have epistemic responsibilities as well as moral responsibilities.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84877996818&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84877996818&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00948705.2013.785423

DO - 10.1080/00948705.2013.785423

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 135

EP - 162

JO - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport

JF - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport

SN - 0094-8705

IS - 1

ER -