Survey of minimally invasive general surgery fellows training in robotic surgery

Abhijit Shaligram, Avishai Meyer, Anton Simorov, Pradeep Pallati, Dmitry Oleynikov

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Minimally invasive surgery fellowships offer experience in robotic surgery, the nature of which is poorly defined. The objective of this survey was to determine the current status and opportunities for robotic surgery training available to fellows training in the United States and Canada. Sixty-five minimally invasive surgery fellows, attending a fundamentals of fellowship conference, were asked to complete a questionnaire regarding their demographics and experiences with robotic surgery and training. Fifty-one of the surveyed fellows completed the questionnaire (83 % response). Seventy-two percent of respondents had staff surgeons trained in performing robotic procedures, with 55 % of respondents having general surgery procedures performed robotically at their institution. Just over half (53 %) had access to a simulation facility for robotic training. Thirty-three percent offered mechanisms for certification and 11 % offered fellowships in robotic surgery. One-third of the minimally invasive surgery fellows felt they had been trained in robotic surgery and would consider making it part of their practice after fellowship. However, most (80 %) had no plans to pursue robotic surgery fellowships. Although a large group (63 %) felt optimistic about the future of robotic surgery, most respondents (72.5 %) felt their current experience with robotic surgery training was poor or below average. There is wide variation in exposure to and training in robotic surgery in minimally invasive surgery fellowship programs in the United States and Canada. Although a third of trainees felt adequately trained for performing robotic procedures, most fellows felt that their current experience with training was not adequate.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)131-136
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Robotic Surgery
Volume7
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
Robotics
Canada
Surveys and Questionnaires
Certification
Demography

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Health Informatics

Cite this

Survey of minimally invasive general surgery fellows training in robotic surgery. / Shaligram, Abhijit; Meyer, Avishai; Simorov, Anton; Pallati, Pradeep; Oleynikov, Dmitry.

In: Journal of Robotic Surgery, Vol. 7, No. 2, 06.2013, p. 131-136.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Shaligram, A, Meyer, A, Simorov, A, Pallati, P & Oleynikov, D 2013, 'Survey of minimally invasive general surgery fellows training in robotic surgery', Journal of Robotic Surgery, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 131-136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-012-0355-2
Shaligram, Abhijit ; Meyer, Avishai ; Simorov, Anton ; Pallati, Pradeep ; Oleynikov, Dmitry. / Survey of minimally invasive general surgery fellows training in robotic surgery. In: Journal of Robotic Surgery. 2013 ; Vol. 7, No. 2. pp. 131-136.
@article{0018139ecc114060829da58cc026d1c0,
title = "Survey of minimally invasive general surgery fellows training in robotic surgery",
abstract = "Minimally invasive surgery fellowships offer experience in robotic surgery, the nature of which is poorly defined. The objective of this survey was to determine the current status and opportunities for robotic surgery training available to fellows training in the United States and Canada. Sixty-five minimally invasive surgery fellows, attending a fundamentals of fellowship conference, were asked to complete a questionnaire regarding their demographics and experiences with robotic surgery and training. Fifty-one of the surveyed fellows completed the questionnaire (83 {\%} response). Seventy-two percent of respondents had staff surgeons trained in performing robotic procedures, with 55 {\%} of respondents having general surgery procedures performed robotically at their institution. Just over half (53 {\%}) had access to a simulation facility for robotic training. Thirty-three percent offered mechanisms for certification and 11 {\%} offered fellowships in robotic surgery. One-third of the minimally invasive surgery fellows felt they had been trained in robotic surgery and would consider making it part of their practice after fellowship. However, most (80 {\%}) had no plans to pursue robotic surgery fellowships. Although a large group (63 {\%}) felt optimistic about the future of robotic surgery, most respondents (72.5 {\%}) felt their current experience with robotic surgery training was poor or below average. There is wide variation in exposure to and training in robotic surgery in minimally invasive surgery fellowship programs in the United States and Canada. Although a third of trainees felt adequately trained for performing robotic procedures, most fellows felt that their current experience with training was not adequate.",
author = "Abhijit Shaligram and Avishai Meyer and Anton Simorov and Pradeep Pallati and Dmitry Oleynikov",
year = "2013",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1007/s11701-012-0355-2",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "131--136",
journal = "Journal of Robotic Surgery",
issn = "1863-2483",
publisher = "Springer London",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Survey of minimally invasive general surgery fellows training in robotic surgery

AU - Shaligram, Abhijit

AU - Meyer, Avishai

AU - Simorov, Anton

AU - Pallati, Pradeep

AU - Oleynikov, Dmitry

PY - 2013/6

Y1 - 2013/6

N2 - Minimally invasive surgery fellowships offer experience in robotic surgery, the nature of which is poorly defined. The objective of this survey was to determine the current status and opportunities for robotic surgery training available to fellows training in the United States and Canada. Sixty-five minimally invasive surgery fellows, attending a fundamentals of fellowship conference, were asked to complete a questionnaire regarding their demographics and experiences with robotic surgery and training. Fifty-one of the surveyed fellows completed the questionnaire (83 % response). Seventy-two percent of respondents had staff surgeons trained in performing robotic procedures, with 55 % of respondents having general surgery procedures performed robotically at their institution. Just over half (53 %) had access to a simulation facility for robotic training. Thirty-three percent offered mechanisms for certification and 11 % offered fellowships in robotic surgery. One-third of the minimally invasive surgery fellows felt they had been trained in robotic surgery and would consider making it part of their practice after fellowship. However, most (80 %) had no plans to pursue robotic surgery fellowships. Although a large group (63 %) felt optimistic about the future of robotic surgery, most respondents (72.5 %) felt their current experience with robotic surgery training was poor or below average. There is wide variation in exposure to and training in robotic surgery in minimally invasive surgery fellowship programs in the United States and Canada. Although a third of trainees felt adequately trained for performing robotic procedures, most fellows felt that their current experience with training was not adequate.

AB - Minimally invasive surgery fellowships offer experience in robotic surgery, the nature of which is poorly defined. The objective of this survey was to determine the current status and opportunities for robotic surgery training available to fellows training in the United States and Canada. Sixty-five minimally invasive surgery fellows, attending a fundamentals of fellowship conference, were asked to complete a questionnaire regarding their demographics and experiences with robotic surgery and training. Fifty-one of the surveyed fellows completed the questionnaire (83 % response). Seventy-two percent of respondents had staff surgeons trained in performing robotic procedures, with 55 % of respondents having general surgery procedures performed robotically at their institution. Just over half (53 %) had access to a simulation facility for robotic training. Thirty-three percent offered mechanisms for certification and 11 % offered fellowships in robotic surgery. One-third of the minimally invasive surgery fellows felt they had been trained in robotic surgery and would consider making it part of their practice after fellowship. However, most (80 %) had no plans to pursue robotic surgery fellowships. Although a large group (63 %) felt optimistic about the future of robotic surgery, most respondents (72.5 %) felt their current experience with robotic surgery training was poor or below average. There is wide variation in exposure to and training in robotic surgery in minimally invasive surgery fellowship programs in the United States and Canada. Although a third of trainees felt adequately trained for performing robotic procedures, most fellows felt that their current experience with training was not adequate.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84878105628&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84878105628&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11701-012-0355-2

DO - 10.1007/s11701-012-0355-2

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84878105628

VL - 7

SP - 131

EP - 136

JO - Journal of Robotic Surgery

JF - Journal of Robotic Surgery

SN - 1863-2483

IS - 2

ER -