Abstract
Background and aims: The Korean Hereditary Tumor Registry has proposed criteria for suspected hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (S-HNPCC criteria I and II) and confirmed their validity in an international collaborative study. The S-HNPCC criteria included families that did not fulfill the Amsterdam criteria, but in whom HNPCC was nevertheless strongly suspected. The S-HNPCC criteria was also revised accordingly since some S-HNPCC families now fullfil the revised Amsterdam criteria. The original Amsterdam criteria have recently been revised, including some extracolonic cancers. This study compared the mutation detection rates between the revised and previous Amsterdam and S-HNPCC criteria. Patients and methods: Data on the mutational status of 393 HNPCC suspected families were collected from ten different institutes. Two hundred families were categorized into old S-HNPCC criteria (142 into criteria I and 58 into criteria II) and 193 families into Amsterdam criteria I. Results: Of the 142 old S-HNPCC criteria I families 24 fulfilled the Amsterdam criteria II as the data were reclassified according to the revised criteria, increasing the proportion of the families fulfilling the Amsterdam criteria by 12.4%. The mutation detection rate of the revised criteria was very little changed compared to the old criteria; 26% and 27% in the S-HNPCC criteria, and 50% and 52% in the Amsterdam criteria. Conclusion: The mutation detection rate is hardly affected by the revision of the Amsterdam criteria although the population of patients fulfilling the criteria is increased. The value of revised S-HNPCC criteria is equivalent to that of as the old S-HNPCC criteria in selecting of candidate patients for genetic testing.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 109-114 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | International Journal of Colorectal Disease |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2002 |
Fingerprint
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Gastroenterology
Cite this
Suspected HNPCC and Amsterdam criteria II : Evaluation of mutation detection rate, an international collaborative study. / Park, Jae Gahb; Vasen, Hans F A; Park, Young Jin; Park, Kyu Joo; Peltomaki, Paivi; Ponzo de Leon, Maurizio; Rodriguez-Bigas, Miguel A.; Lubinski, Jan; Beck, Nicholas E.; Bisgaard, Marie Luise; Miyaki, Michiko; Wijnen, Juul T.; Baba, Shozo; Lindblom, Annika; Madlensky, Lisa; Lynch, Henry T.
In: International Journal of Colorectal Disease, Vol. 17, No. 2, 2002, p. 109-114.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Suspected HNPCC and Amsterdam criteria II
T2 - Evaluation of mutation detection rate, an international collaborative study
AU - Park, Jae Gahb
AU - Vasen, Hans F A
AU - Park, Young Jin
AU - Park, Kyu Joo
AU - Peltomaki, Paivi
AU - Ponzo de Leon, Maurizio
AU - Rodriguez-Bigas, Miguel A.
AU - Lubinski, Jan
AU - Beck, Nicholas E.
AU - Bisgaard, Marie Luise
AU - Miyaki, Michiko
AU - Wijnen, Juul T.
AU - Baba, Shozo
AU - Lindblom, Annika
AU - Madlensky, Lisa
AU - Lynch, Henry T.
PY - 2002
Y1 - 2002
N2 - Background and aims: The Korean Hereditary Tumor Registry has proposed criteria for suspected hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (S-HNPCC criteria I and II) and confirmed their validity in an international collaborative study. The S-HNPCC criteria included families that did not fulfill the Amsterdam criteria, but in whom HNPCC was nevertheless strongly suspected. The S-HNPCC criteria was also revised accordingly since some S-HNPCC families now fullfil the revised Amsterdam criteria. The original Amsterdam criteria have recently been revised, including some extracolonic cancers. This study compared the mutation detection rates between the revised and previous Amsterdam and S-HNPCC criteria. Patients and methods: Data on the mutational status of 393 HNPCC suspected families were collected from ten different institutes. Two hundred families were categorized into old S-HNPCC criteria (142 into criteria I and 58 into criteria II) and 193 families into Amsterdam criteria I. Results: Of the 142 old S-HNPCC criteria I families 24 fulfilled the Amsterdam criteria II as the data were reclassified according to the revised criteria, increasing the proportion of the families fulfilling the Amsterdam criteria by 12.4%. The mutation detection rate of the revised criteria was very little changed compared to the old criteria; 26% and 27% in the S-HNPCC criteria, and 50% and 52% in the Amsterdam criteria. Conclusion: The mutation detection rate is hardly affected by the revision of the Amsterdam criteria although the population of patients fulfilling the criteria is increased. The value of revised S-HNPCC criteria is equivalent to that of as the old S-HNPCC criteria in selecting of candidate patients for genetic testing.
AB - Background and aims: The Korean Hereditary Tumor Registry has proposed criteria for suspected hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (S-HNPCC criteria I and II) and confirmed their validity in an international collaborative study. The S-HNPCC criteria included families that did not fulfill the Amsterdam criteria, but in whom HNPCC was nevertheless strongly suspected. The S-HNPCC criteria was also revised accordingly since some S-HNPCC families now fullfil the revised Amsterdam criteria. The original Amsterdam criteria have recently been revised, including some extracolonic cancers. This study compared the mutation detection rates between the revised and previous Amsterdam and S-HNPCC criteria. Patients and methods: Data on the mutational status of 393 HNPCC suspected families were collected from ten different institutes. Two hundred families were categorized into old S-HNPCC criteria (142 into criteria I and 58 into criteria II) and 193 families into Amsterdam criteria I. Results: Of the 142 old S-HNPCC criteria I families 24 fulfilled the Amsterdam criteria II as the data were reclassified according to the revised criteria, increasing the proportion of the families fulfilling the Amsterdam criteria by 12.4%. The mutation detection rate of the revised criteria was very little changed compared to the old criteria; 26% and 27% in the S-HNPCC criteria, and 50% and 52% in the Amsterdam criteria. Conclusion: The mutation detection rate is hardly affected by the revision of the Amsterdam criteria although the population of patients fulfilling the criteria is increased. The value of revised S-HNPCC criteria is equivalent to that of as the old S-HNPCC criteria in selecting of candidate patients for genetic testing.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036935179&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036935179&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s003840100348
DO - 10.1007/s003840100348
M3 - Article
C2 - 12014418
AN - SCOPUS:0036935179
VL - 17
SP - 109
EP - 114
JO - International Journal of Colorectal Disease
JF - International Journal of Colorectal Disease
SN - 0179-1958
IS - 2
ER -