Symptom burden clusters and their impact on psychosocial functioning following coronary artery bypass surgery

Amy A. Abbott, Susan Barnason, Lani Zimmerman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although there is extensive literature on symptoms experienced by patients after coronary artery bypass surgery (CABS), there is a paucity of data on symptom clusters and their impact on functional outcomes. The purpose of these descriptive, secondary analyses was to identify and describe cluster subgroups of 226 elderly CABS patients at discharge and to examine the cluster's impact on psychosocial functioning over time (baseline, 6 weeks, and 3 months) using the 36-item Medical Outcome Study Short Form subscales. Cluster analysis revealed a 3-cluster solution with low, low-moderate, and moderate symptom burden clusters. Significant differences were detected for Duke Activity Status Index (F 2,223 = 5.12, P = .007), Barnason Efficacy Expectation Scale (F 2,223 = 9.60, P <.0001), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (F2,219 = 15.14, P <.0001), and New York Heart Association classification (χ = 17.44, P = .008). Significant differences were noted on all variables between the low and moderate symptom burden clusters with differences between the low-moderate and moderate clusters for only the Barnason Efficacy Expectation Scale and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Those in the moderate symptom burden cluster had more symptoms, anxiety, and depression along with lower self-efficacy and physiological functioning than those in the other 2 clusters. There was no interaction or simple main effects for the role-emotional or social subscales as measured by the 36-item Medical Outcome Study Short Form. There was no significant interaction for mental functioning by time and cluster (F4,641 = .30, P = .88); however, there was a simple main effect for cluster (F2,641 = 4.11, P = .02). Follow-up analysis indicated significant differences between the low and low-moderate clusters, indicating that those with low symptom burden had significantly better mental health functioning than those with moderate symptom burden. Findings provide a foundation of knowledge on symptom clusters in CABS populations and may be useful to clinicians to identify patients at risk for slowed or delayed recovery and for early intervention.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)301-310
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Cardiovascular Nursing
Volume25
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2010

Fingerprint

Coronary Artery Bypass
Anxiety
Depression
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Patient Discharge
Self Efficacy
Cluster Analysis
Mental Health
Population

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Advanced and Specialized Nursing
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Symptom burden clusters and their impact on psychosocial functioning following coronary artery bypass surgery. / Abbott, Amy A.; Barnason, Susan; Zimmerman, Lani.

In: Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, Vol. 25, No. 4, 07.2010, p. 301-310.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4c77d01eb54a42fcaf73151b9587a159,
title = "Symptom burden clusters and their impact on psychosocial functioning following coronary artery bypass surgery",
abstract = "Although there is extensive literature on symptoms experienced by patients after coronary artery bypass surgery (CABS), there is a paucity of data on symptom clusters and their impact on functional outcomes. The purpose of these descriptive, secondary analyses was to identify and describe cluster subgroups of 226 elderly CABS patients at discharge and to examine the cluster's impact on psychosocial functioning over time (baseline, 6 weeks, and 3 months) using the 36-item Medical Outcome Study Short Form subscales. Cluster analysis revealed a 3-cluster solution with low, low-moderate, and moderate symptom burden clusters. Significant differences were detected for Duke Activity Status Index (F 2,223 = 5.12, P = .007), Barnason Efficacy Expectation Scale (F 2,223 = 9.60, P <.0001), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (F2,219 = 15.14, P <.0001), and New York Heart Association classification (χ = 17.44, P = .008). Significant differences were noted on all variables between the low and moderate symptom burden clusters with differences between the low-moderate and moderate clusters for only the Barnason Efficacy Expectation Scale and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Those in the moderate symptom burden cluster had more symptoms, anxiety, and depression along with lower self-efficacy and physiological functioning than those in the other 2 clusters. There was no interaction or simple main effects for the role-emotional or social subscales as measured by the 36-item Medical Outcome Study Short Form. There was no significant interaction for mental functioning by time and cluster (F4,641 = .30, P = .88); however, there was a simple main effect for cluster (F2,641 = 4.11, P = .02). Follow-up analysis indicated significant differences between the low and low-moderate clusters, indicating that those with low symptom burden had significantly better mental health functioning than those with moderate symptom burden. Findings provide a foundation of knowledge on symptom clusters in CABS populations and may be useful to clinicians to identify patients at risk for slowed or delayed recovery and for early intervention.",
author = "Abbott, {Amy A.} and Susan Barnason and Lani Zimmerman",
year = "2010",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1097/JCN.0b013e3181cfbb46",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "301--310",
journal = "Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing",
issn = "0889-4655",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Symptom burden clusters and their impact on psychosocial functioning following coronary artery bypass surgery

AU - Abbott, Amy A.

AU - Barnason, Susan

AU - Zimmerman, Lani

PY - 2010/7

Y1 - 2010/7

N2 - Although there is extensive literature on symptoms experienced by patients after coronary artery bypass surgery (CABS), there is a paucity of data on symptom clusters and their impact on functional outcomes. The purpose of these descriptive, secondary analyses was to identify and describe cluster subgroups of 226 elderly CABS patients at discharge and to examine the cluster's impact on psychosocial functioning over time (baseline, 6 weeks, and 3 months) using the 36-item Medical Outcome Study Short Form subscales. Cluster analysis revealed a 3-cluster solution with low, low-moderate, and moderate symptom burden clusters. Significant differences were detected for Duke Activity Status Index (F 2,223 = 5.12, P = .007), Barnason Efficacy Expectation Scale (F 2,223 = 9.60, P <.0001), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (F2,219 = 15.14, P <.0001), and New York Heart Association classification (χ = 17.44, P = .008). Significant differences were noted on all variables between the low and moderate symptom burden clusters with differences between the low-moderate and moderate clusters for only the Barnason Efficacy Expectation Scale and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Those in the moderate symptom burden cluster had more symptoms, anxiety, and depression along with lower self-efficacy and physiological functioning than those in the other 2 clusters. There was no interaction or simple main effects for the role-emotional or social subscales as measured by the 36-item Medical Outcome Study Short Form. There was no significant interaction for mental functioning by time and cluster (F4,641 = .30, P = .88); however, there was a simple main effect for cluster (F2,641 = 4.11, P = .02). Follow-up analysis indicated significant differences between the low and low-moderate clusters, indicating that those with low symptom burden had significantly better mental health functioning than those with moderate symptom burden. Findings provide a foundation of knowledge on symptom clusters in CABS populations and may be useful to clinicians to identify patients at risk for slowed or delayed recovery and for early intervention.

AB - Although there is extensive literature on symptoms experienced by patients after coronary artery bypass surgery (CABS), there is a paucity of data on symptom clusters and their impact on functional outcomes. The purpose of these descriptive, secondary analyses was to identify and describe cluster subgroups of 226 elderly CABS patients at discharge and to examine the cluster's impact on psychosocial functioning over time (baseline, 6 weeks, and 3 months) using the 36-item Medical Outcome Study Short Form subscales. Cluster analysis revealed a 3-cluster solution with low, low-moderate, and moderate symptom burden clusters. Significant differences were detected for Duke Activity Status Index (F 2,223 = 5.12, P = .007), Barnason Efficacy Expectation Scale (F 2,223 = 9.60, P <.0001), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (F2,219 = 15.14, P <.0001), and New York Heart Association classification (χ = 17.44, P = .008). Significant differences were noted on all variables between the low and moderate symptom burden clusters with differences between the low-moderate and moderate clusters for only the Barnason Efficacy Expectation Scale and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Those in the moderate symptom burden cluster had more symptoms, anxiety, and depression along with lower self-efficacy and physiological functioning than those in the other 2 clusters. There was no interaction or simple main effects for the role-emotional or social subscales as measured by the 36-item Medical Outcome Study Short Form. There was no significant interaction for mental functioning by time and cluster (F4,641 = .30, P = .88); however, there was a simple main effect for cluster (F2,641 = 4.11, P = .02). Follow-up analysis indicated significant differences between the low and low-moderate clusters, indicating that those with low symptom burden had significantly better mental health functioning than those with moderate symptom burden. Findings provide a foundation of knowledge on symptom clusters in CABS populations and may be useful to clinicians to identify patients at risk for slowed or delayed recovery and for early intervention.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77953993113&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77953993113&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/JCN.0b013e3181cfbb46

DO - 10.1097/JCN.0b013e3181cfbb46

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 301

EP - 310

JO - Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing

JF - Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing

SN - 0889-4655

IS - 4

ER -