Tallness versus shrinkage: Do women shrink with age or grow taller with recent birth date?

K. M. Davies, Robert R. Recker, M. R. Stegman, R. P. Heaney

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper presents evidence that much of the high rate of age-related height loss in women reported in cross-sectional studies is actually a cohort effect rather than an aging effect. Data from a large cross-sectional study of healthy, white American women indicate that there has been a gain in peak adult height of 1.0 cm per decade for several decades from 1900 through 1965. Data from the HES, HANES I, and HANES II studies concur on this point. By contrast, data from a longitudinal study of 191 healthy white U.S. women show only a trivial rate of decline from peak adult height in the fifth and sixth decades of life. In an unselected population, some apparent height loss with age is probably due to disease processes, such as vertebral collapse. Caution is needed in using aging to interpret differences in height and in height-dependent variables, such as bone density, in cross-sectional studies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1115-1120
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Bone and Mineral Research
Volume6
Issue number10
StatePublished - 1991

Fingerprint

Cross-Sectional Studies
Parturition
Cohort Effect
Bone Density
Longitudinal Studies
Population

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery

Cite this

Tallness versus shrinkage : Do women shrink with age or grow taller with recent birth date? / Davies, K. M.; Recker, Robert R.; Stegman, M. R.; Heaney, R. P.

In: Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, Vol. 6, No. 10, 1991, p. 1115-1120.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{102949f896804340bc4853cbe37dd6fc,
title = "Tallness versus shrinkage: Do women shrink with age or grow taller with recent birth date?",
abstract = "This paper presents evidence that much of the high rate of age-related height loss in women reported in cross-sectional studies is actually a cohort effect rather than an aging effect. Data from a large cross-sectional study of healthy, white American women indicate that there has been a gain in peak adult height of 1.0 cm per decade for several decades from 1900 through 1965. Data from the HES, HANES I, and HANES II studies concur on this point. By contrast, data from a longitudinal study of 191 healthy white U.S. women show only a trivial rate of decline from peak adult height in the fifth and sixth decades of life. In an unselected population, some apparent height loss with age is probably due to disease processes, such as vertebral collapse. Caution is needed in using aging to interpret differences in height and in height-dependent variables, such as bone density, in cross-sectional studies.",
author = "Davies, {K. M.} and Recker, {Robert R.} and Stegman, {M. R.} and Heaney, {R. P.}",
year = "1991",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "1115--1120",
journal = "Journal of Bone and Mineral Research",
issn = "0884-0431",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Tallness versus shrinkage

T2 - Do women shrink with age or grow taller with recent birth date?

AU - Davies, K. M.

AU - Recker, Robert R.

AU - Stegman, M. R.

AU - Heaney, R. P.

PY - 1991

Y1 - 1991

N2 - This paper presents evidence that much of the high rate of age-related height loss in women reported in cross-sectional studies is actually a cohort effect rather than an aging effect. Data from a large cross-sectional study of healthy, white American women indicate that there has been a gain in peak adult height of 1.0 cm per decade for several decades from 1900 through 1965. Data from the HES, HANES I, and HANES II studies concur on this point. By contrast, data from a longitudinal study of 191 healthy white U.S. women show only a trivial rate of decline from peak adult height in the fifth and sixth decades of life. In an unselected population, some apparent height loss with age is probably due to disease processes, such as vertebral collapse. Caution is needed in using aging to interpret differences in height and in height-dependent variables, such as bone density, in cross-sectional studies.

AB - This paper presents evidence that much of the high rate of age-related height loss in women reported in cross-sectional studies is actually a cohort effect rather than an aging effect. Data from a large cross-sectional study of healthy, white American women indicate that there has been a gain in peak adult height of 1.0 cm per decade for several decades from 1900 through 1965. Data from the HES, HANES I, and HANES II studies concur on this point. By contrast, data from a longitudinal study of 191 healthy white U.S. women show only a trivial rate of decline from peak adult height in the fifth and sixth decades of life. In an unselected population, some apparent height loss with age is probably due to disease processes, such as vertebral collapse. Caution is needed in using aging to interpret differences in height and in height-dependent variables, such as bone density, in cross-sectional studies.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025999256&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025999256&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 1796758

AN - SCOPUS:0025999256

VL - 6

SP - 1115

EP - 1120

JO - Journal of Bone and Mineral Research

JF - Journal of Bone and Mineral Research

SN - 0884-0431

IS - 10

ER -