Tetracycline fibers plus scaling and root planing versus scaling and root planning alone: Similar results after 5 years

Jr Wilson T.G., M. K. McGuire, G. Greenstein, Martha E. Nunn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

THIS PAPER PRESENTS 5-YEAR data pertaining to a subgroup of patients from a previous investigation who were treated with scaling and root planing plus tetracycline fibers. The parent study demonstrated that 6 months after therapy, scaling and root planing plus tetracycline fiber therapy was significantly better at reducing probing depth and gaining clinical attachment than scaling and root planing alone. However, the long-term data presented here show a regression from the original gains in clinical attachment levels in the fiber group. Ultimately, the use of fibers provided no significant advantage with regards to probing depth reduction or clinical attachment gain. Within the power of this study, which would have required 1.78 mm of change in clinical attachment to show a difference, there was no significant difference between the treatment at 5 years. This study underscores the need for additional long-term evaluation of this mode of therapy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1029-1032
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Periodontology
Volume68
Issue number11
StatePublished - 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dental Scaling
Root Planing
Tetracycline
Therapeutics

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Tetracycline fibers plus scaling and root planing versus scaling and root planning alone : Similar results after 5 years. / Wilson T.G., Jr; McGuire, M. K.; Greenstein, G.; Nunn, Martha E.

In: Journal of Periodontology, Vol. 68, No. 11, 1997, p. 1029-1032.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{80c67a16d9e647109dee636e21e462ce,
title = "Tetracycline fibers plus scaling and root planing versus scaling and root planning alone: Similar results after 5 years",
abstract = "THIS PAPER PRESENTS 5-YEAR data pertaining to a subgroup of patients from a previous investigation who were treated with scaling and root planing plus tetracycline fibers. The parent study demonstrated that 6 months after therapy, scaling and root planing plus tetracycline fiber therapy was significantly better at reducing probing depth and gaining clinical attachment than scaling and root planing alone. However, the long-term data presented here show a regression from the original gains in clinical attachment levels in the fiber group. Ultimately, the use of fibers provided no significant advantage with regards to probing depth reduction or clinical attachment gain. Within the power of this study, which would have required 1.78 mm of change in clinical attachment to show a difference, there was no significant difference between the treatment at 5 years. This study underscores the need for additional long-term evaluation of this mode of therapy.",
author = "{Wilson T.G.}, Jr and McGuire, {M. K.} and G. Greenstein and Nunn, {Martha E.}",
year = "1997",
language = "English",
volume = "68",
pages = "1029--1032",
journal = "Journal of Periodontology",
issn = "0022-3492",
publisher = "American Academy of Periodontology",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Tetracycline fibers plus scaling and root planing versus scaling and root planning alone

T2 - Similar results after 5 years

AU - Wilson T.G., Jr

AU - McGuire, M. K.

AU - Greenstein, G.

AU - Nunn, Martha E.

PY - 1997

Y1 - 1997

N2 - THIS PAPER PRESENTS 5-YEAR data pertaining to a subgroup of patients from a previous investigation who were treated with scaling and root planing plus tetracycline fibers. The parent study demonstrated that 6 months after therapy, scaling and root planing plus tetracycline fiber therapy was significantly better at reducing probing depth and gaining clinical attachment than scaling and root planing alone. However, the long-term data presented here show a regression from the original gains in clinical attachment levels in the fiber group. Ultimately, the use of fibers provided no significant advantage with regards to probing depth reduction or clinical attachment gain. Within the power of this study, which would have required 1.78 mm of change in clinical attachment to show a difference, there was no significant difference between the treatment at 5 years. This study underscores the need for additional long-term evaluation of this mode of therapy.

AB - THIS PAPER PRESENTS 5-YEAR data pertaining to a subgroup of patients from a previous investigation who were treated with scaling and root planing plus tetracycline fibers. The parent study demonstrated that 6 months after therapy, scaling and root planing plus tetracycline fiber therapy was significantly better at reducing probing depth and gaining clinical attachment than scaling and root planing alone. However, the long-term data presented here show a regression from the original gains in clinical attachment levels in the fiber group. Ultimately, the use of fibers provided no significant advantage with regards to probing depth reduction or clinical attachment gain. Within the power of this study, which would have required 1.78 mm of change in clinical attachment to show a difference, there was no significant difference between the treatment at 5 years. This study underscores the need for additional long-term evaluation of this mode of therapy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030731783&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030731783&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 9407394

AN - SCOPUS:0030731783

VL - 68

SP - 1029

EP - 1032

JO - Journal of Periodontology

JF - Journal of Periodontology

SN - 0022-3492

IS - 11

ER -