The Added Complexity of Social Entrepreneurship

A Knowledge-Based Approach

Uĝur Uygur, Alexei Marcoux

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Social entrepreneurship evades easy definition and conceptualization. In this paper, we attempt to advance social entrepreneurship theoretically by examining it conceptually, from a 'theory of the firm' perspective. If social entrepreneurship entails pursuit of a double bottom line (Dees, Harvard Business Review, 76 (1), 54-67, 1998), the added complexity of the social entrepreneurial venture identified by Tracey and Phillips (Academy of Management Learning & Education, 6, 264-71, 2007) should be discoverable from a 'theory of the firm' perspective. Applying the knowledge-based theory of the firm to social entrepreneurship, we aver that social entrepreneurship's added complexity is manifest when social entrepreneurial ventures make decisions about protecting their knowledge. Social entrepreneurial ventures manifest this added complexity in all three ways Tracey and Phillips identify: managing accountability, managing identity, and managing the double bottom line. In contrast to ordinary entrepreneurial ventures, social entrepreneurial ventures have to balance two incommensurable objectives when they make decisions about protection of their knowledge.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)132-152
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of Social Entrepreneurship
Volume4
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

entrepreneurship
knowledge
firm
accountability
learning
education
academy
Entrepreneurial ventures
Knowledge-based
Social entrepreneurship
responsibility
management
decision
Theory of the firm

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Business and International Management
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Development

Cite this

The Added Complexity of Social Entrepreneurship : A Knowledge-Based Approach. / Uygur, Uĝur; Marcoux, Alexei.

In: Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, Vol. 4, No. 2, 07.2013, p. 132-152.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0b29589a77bb4c878826f527f278ada1,
title = "The Added Complexity of Social Entrepreneurship: A Knowledge-Based Approach",
abstract = "Social entrepreneurship evades easy definition and conceptualization. In this paper, we attempt to advance social entrepreneurship theoretically by examining it conceptually, from a 'theory of the firm' perspective. If social entrepreneurship entails pursuit of a double bottom line (Dees, Harvard Business Review, 76 (1), 54-67, 1998), the added complexity of the social entrepreneurial venture identified by Tracey and Phillips (Academy of Management Learning & Education, 6, 264-71, 2007) should be discoverable from a 'theory of the firm' perspective. Applying the knowledge-based theory of the firm to social entrepreneurship, we aver that social entrepreneurship's added complexity is manifest when social entrepreneurial ventures make decisions about protecting their knowledge. Social entrepreneurial ventures manifest this added complexity in all three ways Tracey and Phillips identify: managing accountability, managing identity, and managing the double bottom line. In contrast to ordinary entrepreneurial ventures, social entrepreneurial ventures have to balance two incommensurable objectives when they make decisions about protection of their knowledge.",
author = "Uĝur Uygur and Alexei Marcoux",
year = "2013",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1080/19420676.2013.777357",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "132--152",
journal = "Journal of Social Entrepreneurship",
issn = "1942-0676",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Added Complexity of Social Entrepreneurship

T2 - A Knowledge-Based Approach

AU - Uygur, Uĝur

AU - Marcoux, Alexei

PY - 2013/7

Y1 - 2013/7

N2 - Social entrepreneurship evades easy definition and conceptualization. In this paper, we attempt to advance social entrepreneurship theoretically by examining it conceptually, from a 'theory of the firm' perspective. If social entrepreneurship entails pursuit of a double bottom line (Dees, Harvard Business Review, 76 (1), 54-67, 1998), the added complexity of the social entrepreneurial venture identified by Tracey and Phillips (Academy of Management Learning & Education, 6, 264-71, 2007) should be discoverable from a 'theory of the firm' perspective. Applying the knowledge-based theory of the firm to social entrepreneurship, we aver that social entrepreneurship's added complexity is manifest when social entrepreneurial ventures make decisions about protecting their knowledge. Social entrepreneurial ventures manifest this added complexity in all three ways Tracey and Phillips identify: managing accountability, managing identity, and managing the double bottom line. In contrast to ordinary entrepreneurial ventures, social entrepreneurial ventures have to balance two incommensurable objectives when they make decisions about protection of their knowledge.

AB - Social entrepreneurship evades easy definition and conceptualization. In this paper, we attempt to advance social entrepreneurship theoretically by examining it conceptually, from a 'theory of the firm' perspective. If social entrepreneurship entails pursuit of a double bottom line (Dees, Harvard Business Review, 76 (1), 54-67, 1998), the added complexity of the social entrepreneurial venture identified by Tracey and Phillips (Academy of Management Learning & Education, 6, 264-71, 2007) should be discoverable from a 'theory of the firm' perspective. Applying the knowledge-based theory of the firm to social entrepreneurship, we aver that social entrepreneurship's added complexity is manifest when social entrepreneurial ventures make decisions about protecting their knowledge. Social entrepreneurial ventures manifest this added complexity in all three ways Tracey and Phillips identify: managing accountability, managing identity, and managing the double bottom line. In contrast to ordinary entrepreneurial ventures, social entrepreneurial ventures have to balance two incommensurable objectives when they make decisions about protection of their knowledge.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84880945803&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84880945803&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/19420676.2013.777357

DO - 10.1080/19420676.2013.777357

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 132

EP - 152

JO - Journal of Social Entrepreneurship

JF - Journal of Social Entrepreneurship

SN - 1942-0676

IS - 2

ER -