The clinical utility of batterer typologies

Jennifer Langhinrichsen-Rohling, Matthew T. Huss, Sandra Ramsey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

82 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Domestic violence research has increasingly focused on the identification of batterer subgroups. Although typologies have been proposed using the utility of both empirical and theoretical methodologies, studies comparing empirically derived and theoretically based typology solutions have not been conducted. To what degree mental health practitioners can successfully classify batterers into subgroups is also not known. To address these questions, data were gathered from 49 male batterers who were treated for domestic violence in an outpatient mental health facility. A preliminary comparison of an empirically derived and a theoretically based typology solution revealed that many batterers were classified differently by the two strategies, although the overall grouping strategies were similar in content. Further, mental health professionals had substantial difficulty choosing which of the cluster analytically created subgroups into which to sort individual batterer's MMPI profile. Finally, different treatment efficacy indicators differentiated among the men in the two subtyping systems, suggesting that each system offers unique clinical information.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)37-53
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Family Violence
Volume15
Issue number1
StatePublished - Mar 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

typology
Mental Health
Domestic Violence
mental health
domestic violence
MMPI
Health Facilities
health professionals
grouping
Theoretical Models
Outpatients
methodology
Research

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Psychology(all)
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J., Huss, M. T., & Ramsey, S. (2000). The clinical utility of batterer typologies. Journal of Family Violence, 15(1), 37-53.

The clinical utility of batterer typologies. / Langhinrichsen-Rohling, Jennifer; Huss, Matthew T.; Ramsey, Sandra.

In: Journal of Family Violence, Vol. 15, No. 1, 03.2000, p. 37-53.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J, Huss, MT & Ramsey, S 2000, 'The clinical utility of batterer typologies', Journal of Family Violence, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 37-53.
Langhinrichsen-Rohling J, Huss MT, Ramsey S. The clinical utility of batterer typologies. Journal of Family Violence. 2000 Mar;15(1):37-53.
Langhinrichsen-Rohling, Jennifer ; Huss, Matthew T. ; Ramsey, Sandra. / The clinical utility of batterer typologies. In: Journal of Family Violence. 2000 ; Vol. 15, No. 1. pp. 37-53.
@article{2527e1eb852c45cd9f4c5819a5057020,
title = "The clinical utility of batterer typologies",
abstract = "Domestic violence research has increasingly focused on the identification of batterer subgroups. Although typologies have been proposed using the utility of both empirical and theoretical methodologies, studies comparing empirically derived and theoretically based typology solutions have not been conducted. To what degree mental health practitioners can successfully classify batterers into subgroups is also not known. To address these questions, data were gathered from 49 male batterers who were treated for domestic violence in an outpatient mental health facility. A preliminary comparison of an empirically derived and a theoretically based typology solution revealed that many batterers were classified differently by the two strategies, although the overall grouping strategies were similar in content. Further, mental health professionals had substantial difficulty choosing which of the cluster analytically created subgroups into which to sort individual batterer's MMPI profile. Finally, different treatment efficacy indicators differentiated among the men in the two subtyping systems, suggesting that each system offers unique clinical information.",
author = "Jennifer Langhinrichsen-Rohling and Huss, {Matthew T.} and Sandra Ramsey",
year = "2000",
month = "3",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "37--53",
journal = "Journal of Family Violence",
issn = "0885-7482",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The clinical utility of batterer typologies

AU - Langhinrichsen-Rohling, Jennifer

AU - Huss, Matthew T.

AU - Ramsey, Sandra

PY - 2000/3

Y1 - 2000/3

N2 - Domestic violence research has increasingly focused on the identification of batterer subgroups. Although typologies have been proposed using the utility of both empirical and theoretical methodologies, studies comparing empirically derived and theoretically based typology solutions have not been conducted. To what degree mental health practitioners can successfully classify batterers into subgroups is also not known. To address these questions, data were gathered from 49 male batterers who were treated for domestic violence in an outpatient mental health facility. A preliminary comparison of an empirically derived and a theoretically based typology solution revealed that many batterers were classified differently by the two strategies, although the overall grouping strategies were similar in content. Further, mental health professionals had substantial difficulty choosing which of the cluster analytically created subgroups into which to sort individual batterer's MMPI profile. Finally, different treatment efficacy indicators differentiated among the men in the two subtyping systems, suggesting that each system offers unique clinical information.

AB - Domestic violence research has increasingly focused on the identification of batterer subgroups. Although typologies have been proposed using the utility of both empirical and theoretical methodologies, studies comparing empirically derived and theoretically based typology solutions have not been conducted. To what degree mental health practitioners can successfully classify batterers into subgroups is also not known. To address these questions, data were gathered from 49 male batterers who were treated for domestic violence in an outpatient mental health facility. A preliminary comparison of an empirically derived and a theoretically based typology solution revealed that many batterers were classified differently by the two strategies, although the overall grouping strategies were similar in content. Further, mental health professionals had substantial difficulty choosing which of the cluster analytically created subgroups into which to sort individual batterer's MMPI profile. Finally, different treatment efficacy indicators differentiated among the men in the two subtyping systems, suggesting that each system offers unique clinical information.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034144903&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034144903&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 37

EP - 53

JO - Journal of Family Violence

JF - Journal of Family Violence

SN - 0885-7482

IS - 1

ER -