Abstract
Appellate opinions were evaluated on variables related to expert admissibility to assess the effects of Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. in criminal cases. Analysis reveals changes in appellate courts' consideration of Frye v. United States, the 4 Daubert criteria, and several Federal Rules of Evidence. The importance of Frye and the general acceptance criterion decreased over time, and the importance of the Daubert criteria increased over time. However, these changes were not consistent for all types of testimony. Overall, there is greater reliance on Daubert when determining the admissibility of a scientific expert. However, only criteria related to the Federal Rules of Evidence are reliably related to admissibility decisions. Details of appellate court application of the 4 Daubert criteria, the Federal Rules of Evidence, and other related factors are discussed.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 339-372 |
| Number of pages | 34 |
| Journal | Psychology, Public Policy, and Law |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Dec 2002 |
Fingerprint
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Social Psychology
Cite this
The effects of daubert on the admissibility of expert testimony in state and federal criminal cases. / Groscup, Jennifer L.; Studebaker, Christina A.; Penrod, Steven D.; Huss, Matthew T.; O'Neil, Kevin M.
In: Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, Vol. 8, No. 4, 12.2002, p. 339-372.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - The effects of daubert on the admissibility of expert testimony in state and federal criminal cases
AU - Groscup, Jennifer L.
AU - Studebaker, Christina A.
AU - Penrod, Steven D.
AU - Huss, Matthew T.
AU - O'Neil, Kevin M.
PY - 2002/12
Y1 - 2002/12
N2 - Appellate opinions were evaluated on variables related to expert admissibility to assess the effects of Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. in criminal cases. Analysis reveals changes in appellate courts' consideration of Frye v. United States, the 4 Daubert criteria, and several Federal Rules of Evidence. The importance of Frye and the general acceptance criterion decreased over time, and the importance of the Daubert criteria increased over time. However, these changes were not consistent for all types of testimony. Overall, there is greater reliance on Daubert when determining the admissibility of a scientific expert. However, only criteria related to the Federal Rules of Evidence are reliably related to admissibility decisions. Details of appellate court application of the 4 Daubert criteria, the Federal Rules of Evidence, and other related factors are discussed.
AB - Appellate opinions were evaluated on variables related to expert admissibility to assess the effects of Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. in criminal cases. Analysis reveals changes in appellate courts' consideration of Frye v. United States, the 4 Daubert criteria, and several Federal Rules of Evidence. The importance of Frye and the general acceptance criterion decreased over time, and the importance of the Daubert criteria increased over time. However, these changes were not consistent for all types of testimony. Overall, there is greater reliance on Daubert when determining the admissibility of a scientific expert. However, only criteria related to the Federal Rules of Evidence are reliably related to admissibility decisions. Details of appellate court application of the 4 Daubert criteria, the Federal Rules of Evidence, and other related factors are discussed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=2942590794&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=2942590794&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1037/1076-8971.8.4.339
DO - 10.1037/1076-8971.8.4.339
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:2942590794
VL - 8
SP - 339
EP - 372
JO - Psychology, Public Policy, and Law
JF - Psychology, Public Policy, and Law
SN - 1076-8971
IS - 4
ER -