The elusive concept of bone quality.

Robert R. Recker, M. Janet Barger-Lux

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper outlines information from recent publications that aid our understanding of bone quality in relation to osteoporosis. In practical terms, bone quality designates the properties of bone that contribute to strength but are not assessed by bone densitometry. While osteoporosis is still defined in terms of bone density, the limitations of this approach, long questioned, have become indisputable. In parallel, the results of treatment trials of antiresorptive agents demonstrate that bone density is a flawed surrogate for bone fragility and a weak indicator of antifracture efficacy. The case for emphasizing bone turnover in assessing fracture risk, has become increasingly strong, and a redefinition of osteoporosis on this basis may well occur. New technologies for studying bone microstructure and matrix composition, merging with sophisticated biomechanical assessments, are advancing our ideas regarding bone "damageability" and its effects over time.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)97-100
Number of pages4
JournalCurr Osteoporos Rep
Volume2
Issue number3
StatePublished - Sep 2004

Fingerprint

Bone and Bones
Osteoporosis
Bone Density
Bone Density Conservation Agents
Bone Matrix
Densitometry
Bone Remodeling
Technology

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

Cite this

Recker, R. R., & Barger-Lux, M. J. (2004). The elusive concept of bone quality. Curr Osteoporos Rep, 2(3), 97-100.

The elusive concept of bone quality. / Recker, Robert R.; Barger-Lux, M. Janet.

In: Curr Osteoporos Rep, Vol. 2, No. 3, 09.2004, p. 97-100.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Recker, RR & Barger-Lux, MJ 2004, 'The elusive concept of bone quality.', Curr Osteoporos Rep, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 97-100.
Recker, Robert R. ; Barger-Lux, M. Janet. / The elusive concept of bone quality. In: Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2004 ; Vol. 2, No. 3. pp. 97-100.
@article{6caaca2a6b33455499bcfb956d8d1166,
title = "The elusive concept of bone quality.",
abstract = "This paper outlines information from recent publications that aid our understanding of bone quality in relation to osteoporosis. In practical terms, bone quality designates the properties of bone that contribute to strength but are not assessed by bone densitometry. While osteoporosis is still defined in terms of bone density, the limitations of this approach, long questioned, have become indisputable. In parallel, the results of treatment trials of antiresorptive agents demonstrate that bone density is a flawed surrogate for bone fragility and a weak indicator of antifracture efficacy. The case for emphasizing bone turnover in assessing fracture risk, has become increasingly strong, and a redefinition of osteoporosis on this basis may well occur. New technologies for studying bone microstructure and matrix composition, merging with sophisticated biomechanical assessments, are advancing our ideas regarding bone {"}damageability{"} and its effects over time.",
author = "Recker, {Robert R.} and Barger-Lux, {M. Janet}",
year = "2004",
month = "9",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "97--100",
journal = "Curr Osteoporos Rep",
issn = "1544-1873",
publisher = "Current Science, Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The elusive concept of bone quality.

AU - Recker, Robert R.

AU - Barger-Lux, M. Janet

PY - 2004/9

Y1 - 2004/9

N2 - This paper outlines information from recent publications that aid our understanding of bone quality in relation to osteoporosis. In practical terms, bone quality designates the properties of bone that contribute to strength but are not assessed by bone densitometry. While osteoporosis is still defined in terms of bone density, the limitations of this approach, long questioned, have become indisputable. In parallel, the results of treatment trials of antiresorptive agents demonstrate that bone density is a flawed surrogate for bone fragility and a weak indicator of antifracture efficacy. The case for emphasizing bone turnover in assessing fracture risk, has become increasingly strong, and a redefinition of osteoporosis on this basis may well occur. New technologies for studying bone microstructure and matrix composition, merging with sophisticated biomechanical assessments, are advancing our ideas regarding bone "damageability" and its effects over time.

AB - This paper outlines information from recent publications that aid our understanding of bone quality in relation to osteoporosis. In practical terms, bone quality designates the properties of bone that contribute to strength but are not assessed by bone densitometry. While osteoporosis is still defined in terms of bone density, the limitations of this approach, long questioned, have become indisputable. In parallel, the results of treatment trials of antiresorptive agents demonstrate that bone density is a flawed surrogate for bone fragility and a weak indicator of antifracture efficacy. The case for emphasizing bone turnover in assessing fracture risk, has become increasingly strong, and a redefinition of osteoporosis on this basis may well occur. New technologies for studying bone microstructure and matrix composition, merging with sophisticated biomechanical assessments, are advancing our ideas regarding bone "damageability" and its effects over time.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=17144419988&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=17144419988&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Review article

VL - 2

SP - 97

EP - 100

JO - Curr Osteoporos Rep

JF - Curr Osteoporos Rep

SN - 1544-1873

IS - 3

ER -