TY - CHAP
T1 - The Fiscal Squeeze
T2 - Budgets Between Fiscal Illusion, Fiscal Commons, and the Tyranny of Experts
AU - Thomas, Diana W.
AU - Thomas, Michael D.
N1 - Funding Information:
We?d like to thank Ben Powell and all participants at the paper workshop at the Free Market Institute at Texas Tech University for their constructive comments on an earlier draft of this chapter.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - The combination of subsidiarity with the principles of fiscal federalism ensures that the government has the knowledge to provide the economically efficient number and amount of public goods without either leaving too much or too little productive activity to the sphere of private exchange. In this paper, we argue that, over the last 100 years, these two design principles of federalism have slowly eroded and we highlight one of the fiscal consequences of this process of erosion: increasing budgetary pressure at the state level. We call this specific consequence the fiscal squeeze, because states have remained fiscally responsible for decisions that are now made at the level of the federal government and, as a result, are experiencing systematically greater budgetary pressures. Empirically, paying for school funding, health care funding, and pension funds, to name a few, has strained the ability of many states to keep balanced budgets and avoid debt or default.
AB - The combination of subsidiarity with the principles of fiscal federalism ensures that the government has the knowledge to provide the economically efficient number and amount of public goods without either leaving too much or too little productive activity to the sphere of private exchange. In this paper, we argue that, over the last 100 years, these two design principles of federalism have slowly eroded and we highlight one of the fiscal consequences of this process of erosion: increasing budgetary pressure at the state level. We call this specific consequence the fiscal squeeze, because states have remained fiscally responsible for decisions that are now made at the level of the federal government and, as a result, are experiencing systematically greater budgetary pressures. Empirically, paying for school funding, health care funding, and pension funds, to name a few, has strained the ability of many states to keep balanced budgets and avoid debt or default.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85125578758&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85125578758&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-030-56088-1_10
DO - 10.1007/978-3-030-56088-1_10
M3 - Chapter
AN - SCOPUS:85125578758
T3 - Studies in Public Choice
SP - 125
EP - 137
BT - Studies in Public Choice
PB - Springer
ER -