The institutional context of epistemic communities: Experts in P. T. Bauer's work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

The growth of knowledge literature acknowledges the importance of the institutional context of science for the discovery of knowledge. This chapter argues that in addition to the institutions that connect experts, the institutional context that exists between experts and their subjects importantly influences the relevance of the knowledge that experts discover. When experts are removed from their subject and feedback mechanisms are weak, the type of knowledge discovered by networks of experts has little policy relevance. When experts operate in a network that is closely linked to their subjects, the type of knowledge they discover will have a greater degree of policy relevance. Evidence from P. T. Bauer's work on different networks of experts in the developing world is used to illustrate this theory.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationExperts and Epistemic Monopolies
Pages81-97
Number of pages17
Volume17
DOIs
StatePublished - 2012
Externally publishedYes

Publication series

NameAdvances in Austrian Economics
Volume17
ISSN (Print)15292134

Fingerprint

Institutional context
Epistemic communities
Expert knowledge
Developing world
Feedback mechanism

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

Thomas, D. W. (2012). The institutional context of epistemic communities: Experts in P. T. Bauer's work. In Experts and Epistemic Monopolies (Vol. 17, pp. 81-97). [17053424] (Advances in Austrian Economics; Vol. 17). https://doi.org/10.1108/S1529-2134(2012)0000017008

The institutional context of epistemic communities : Experts in P. T. Bauer's work. / Thomas, Diana W.

Experts and Epistemic Monopolies. Vol. 17 2012. p. 81-97 17053424 (Advances in Austrian Economics; Vol. 17).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Thomas, DW 2012, The institutional context of epistemic communities: Experts in P. T. Bauer's work. in Experts and Epistemic Monopolies. vol. 17, 17053424, Advances in Austrian Economics, vol. 17, pp. 81-97. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1529-2134(2012)0000017008
Thomas DW. The institutional context of epistemic communities: Experts in P. T. Bauer's work. In Experts and Epistemic Monopolies. Vol. 17. 2012. p. 81-97. 17053424. (Advances in Austrian Economics). https://doi.org/10.1108/S1529-2134(2012)0000017008
Thomas, Diana W. / The institutional context of epistemic communities : Experts in P. T. Bauer's work. Experts and Epistemic Monopolies. Vol. 17 2012. pp. 81-97 (Advances in Austrian Economics).
@inbook{b9d283b152e34d8d866656ccb3ce12b2,
title = "The institutional context of epistemic communities: Experts in P. T. Bauer's work",
abstract = "The growth of knowledge literature acknowledges the importance of the institutional context of science for the discovery of knowledge. This chapter argues that in addition to the institutions that connect experts, the institutional context that exists between experts and their subjects importantly influences the relevance of the knowledge that experts discover. When experts are removed from their subject and feedback mechanisms are weak, the type of knowledge discovered by networks of experts has little policy relevance. When experts operate in a network that is closely linked to their subjects, the type of knowledge they discover will have a greater degree of policy relevance. Evidence from P. T. Bauer's work on different networks of experts in the developing world is used to illustrate this theory.",
author = "Thomas, {Diana W.}",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1108/S1529-2134(2012)0000017008",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781781902165",
volume = "17",
series = "Advances in Austrian Economics",
pages = "81--97",
booktitle = "Experts and Epistemic Monopolies",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - The institutional context of epistemic communities

T2 - Experts in P. T. Bauer's work

AU - Thomas, Diana W.

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - The growth of knowledge literature acknowledges the importance of the institutional context of science for the discovery of knowledge. This chapter argues that in addition to the institutions that connect experts, the institutional context that exists between experts and their subjects importantly influences the relevance of the knowledge that experts discover. When experts are removed from their subject and feedback mechanisms are weak, the type of knowledge discovered by networks of experts has little policy relevance. When experts operate in a network that is closely linked to their subjects, the type of knowledge they discover will have a greater degree of policy relevance. Evidence from P. T. Bauer's work on different networks of experts in the developing world is used to illustrate this theory.

AB - The growth of knowledge literature acknowledges the importance of the institutional context of science for the discovery of knowledge. This chapter argues that in addition to the institutions that connect experts, the institutional context that exists between experts and their subjects importantly influences the relevance of the knowledge that experts discover. When experts are removed from their subject and feedback mechanisms are weak, the type of knowledge discovered by networks of experts has little policy relevance. When experts operate in a network that is closely linked to their subjects, the type of knowledge they discover will have a greater degree of policy relevance. Evidence from P. T. Bauer's work on different networks of experts in the developing world is used to illustrate this theory.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84884633595&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84884633595&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/S1529-2134(2012)0000017008

DO - 10.1108/S1529-2134(2012)0000017008

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84884633595

SN - 9781781902165

VL - 17

T3 - Advances in Austrian Economics

SP - 81

EP - 97

BT - Experts and Epistemic Monopolies

ER -