TY - JOUR
T1 - The lock-in loophole
T2 - Using mixed methods to explain patient circumvention of a Medicaid opioid restriction program
AU - Roberts, Andrew W.
AU - Skinner, Asheley C.
AU - Lauffenburger, Julie C.
AU - Galt, Kimberly A.
N1 - Funding Information:
Dr. Roberts received research support funding from the AcademyHealth New Investigator Small Grant Program, as well as salary and research support from a CTSA career development grant from National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences [KL2 TR000119] to the Frontiers: the University of Kansas Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute. Data were obtained as part of the parent project grant funded by Cooperative Agreement [CDC U01 CE002160-01], and North Carolina Translational and Clinical Sciences Institute [UL1TR000083] (PI: Skinner). The funding organizations had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Background: Lock-in programs are proliferating among private and public payers to restrict access to controlled substance prescriptions and enhance care coordination for patients exhibiting high-risk use of, primarily, opioids. Patients enrolled in lock-in programs are required to seek opioids from a designated provider and pharmacy for insurance coverage of their opioid and benzodiazepine prescriptions. Lock-in program restrictions are often circumvented by patients through out-of-pocket cash purchases of opioid prescriptions, undermining the program’s intended function. This study sought to construct and explain trajectories of Medicaid-covered and cash pay opioid prescription fills among adults enrolled in an opioid lock-in program. Methods: We used sequential explanatory mixed methods, which involved a quantitative retrospective cohort analysis of opioid fill trajectories using North Carolina Medicaid administrative claims data linked with state prescription drug monitoring program data, followed by qualitative semi-structured interviews with North Carolina pharmacists. The quantitative component included adults enrolled in the North Carolina Medicaid lock-in program between 10/1/2010-3/31/2012. The qualitative component included a maximum variation sample of community pharmacists in North Carolina delivering care to lock-in patients. Quantitative outcomes included group-based trajectories of monthly Medicaid-covered and cash pay opioid prescription fills six months before and after LIP enrollment, and qualitative analyses generated themes explaining observed trajectories. Results: Two-thirds of subjects exhibited reduced Medicaid-covered opioid prescription fills and no increase in cash pay fills after lock-in enrollment, with one-third exhibiting increased cash pay fills after lock-in. Pharmacists attributed increases in cash pay fills primarily to illicit behaviors, while some cash pay behavior likely reflected new unintended barriers to care. Conclusions: Lock-in programs appear to reduce prescription opioid use for most enrolled patients. However, lock-in programs may have limited capacity to deter illicit behaviors among patients intent on abusing, misusing, or diverting these medications and may introduce new access barriers to necessary care for some.
AB - Background: Lock-in programs are proliferating among private and public payers to restrict access to controlled substance prescriptions and enhance care coordination for patients exhibiting high-risk use of, primarily, opioids. Patients enrolled in lock-in programs are required to seek opioids from a designated provider and pharmacy for insurance coverage of their opioid and benzodiazepine prescriptions. Lock-in program restrictions are often circumvented by patients through out-of-pocket cash purchases of opioid prescriptions, undermining the program’s intended function. This study sought to construct and explain trajectories of Medicaid-covered and cash pay opioid prescription fills among adults enrolled in an opioid lock-in program. Methods: We used sequential explanatory mixed methods, which involved a quantitative retrospective cohort analysis of opioid fill trajectories using North Carolina Medicaid administrative claims data linked with state prescription drug monitoring program data, followed by qualitative semi-structured interviews with North Carolina pharmacists. The quantitative component included adults enrolled in the North Carolina Medicaid lock-in program between 10/1/2010-3/31/2012. The qualitative component included a maximum variation sample of community pharmacists in North Carolina delivering care to lock-in patients. Quantitative outcomes included group-based trajectories of monthly Medicaid-covered and cash pay opioid prescription fills six months before and after LIP enrollment, and qualitative analyses generated themes explaining observed trajectories. Results: Two-thirds of subjects exhibited reduced Medicaid-covered opioid prescription fills and no increase in cash pay fills after lock-in enrollment, with one-third exhibiting increased cash pay fills after lock-in. Pharmacists attributed increases in cash pay fills primarily to illicit behaviors, while some cash pay behavior likely reflected new unintended barriers to care. Conclusions: Lock-in programs appear to reduce prescription opioid use for most enrolled patients. However, lock-in programs may have limited capacity to deter illicit behaviors among patients intent on abusing, misusing, or diverting these medications and may introduce new access barriers to necessary care for some.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074590102&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85074590102&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/08897077.2019.1674239
DO - 10.1080/08897077.2019.1674239
M3 - Article
C2 - 31644398
AN - SCOPUS:85074590102
VL - 41
SP - 510
EP - 518
JO - Substance Abuse
JF - Substance Abuse
SN - 0889-7077
IS - 4
ER -