"The policy exists but you can't really use it"

Communication and the structuration of work-family policies

Erika L. Kirby, K. Krone

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

232 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although work-family benefits are increasingly important organizational policies, limited research addresses the impact of communication on benefit utilization. However, communication is significant because the perceived appropriateness of work-family benefits emerges through interaction. For example, when coworkers complain about "picking up the slack" for those using family leave, their discourse may impact future decisions of other workers regarding whether they utilize the work-family benefits available to them. We apply Giddens' (1984) Structuration Theory to examine organizational members' discursive responses to conditions (and contradictions) present in utilizing work-family benefits in a governmental organization. We argue the daily discursive practices of individuals can either reinforce or undermine formally stated work-family initiatives, and in turn discuss the implications of this "structuration" of policy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)50-77
Number of pages28
JournalJournal of Applied Communication Research
Volume30
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2002

Fingerprint

structuration
family policy
family work
communication
Communication
co-worker
utilization
Structuration
worker
organization
discourse
present
interaction

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Communication
  • Language and Linguistics

Cite this

@article{05d1c2e2e78f46c19b96c1f385a16b18,
title = "{"}The policy exists but you can't really use it{"}: Communication and the structuration of work-family policies",
abstract = "Although work-family benefits are increasingly important organizational policies, limited research addresses the impact of communication on benefit utilization. However, communication is significant because the perceived appropriateness of work-family benefits emerges through interaction. For example, when coworkers complain about {"}picking up the slack{"} for those using family leave, their discourse may impact future decisions of other workers regarding whether they utilize the work-family benefits available to them. We apply Giddens' (1984) Structuration Theory to examine organizational members' discursive responses to conditions (and contradictions) present in utilizing work-family benefits in a governmental organization. We argue the daily discursive practices of individuals can either reinforce or undermine formally stated work-family initiatives, and in turn discuss the implications of this {"}structuration{"} of policy.",
author = "Kirby, {Erika L.} and K. Krone",
year = "2002",
doi = "10.1080/00909880216577",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "50--77",
journal = "Journal of Applied Communication Research",
issn = "0090-9882",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - "The policy exists but you can't really use it"

T2 - Communication and the structuration of work-family policies

AU - Kirby, Erika L.

AU - Krone, K.

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - Although work-family benefits are increasingly important organizational policies, limited research addresses the impact of communication on benefit utilization. However, communication is significant because the perceived appropriateness of work-family benefits emerges through interaction. For example, when coworkers complain about "picking up the slack" for those using family leave, their discourse may impact future decisions of other workers regarding whether they utilize the work-family benefits available to them. We apply Giddens' (1984) Structuration Theory to examine organizational members' discursive responses to conditions (and contradictions) present in utilizing work-family benefits in a governmental organization. We argue the daily discursive practices of individuals can either reinforce or undermine formally stated work-family initiatives, and in turn discuss the implications of this "structuration" of policy.

AB - Although work-family benefits are increasingly important organizational policies, limited research addresses the impact of communication on benefit utilization. However, communication is significant because the perceived appropriateness of work-family benefits emerges through interaction. For example, when coworkers complain about "picking up the slack" for those using family leave, their discourse may impact future decisions of other workers regarding whether they utilize the work-family benefits available to them. We apply Giddens' (1984) Structuration Theory to examine organizational members' discursive responses to conditions (and contradictions) present in utilizing work-family benefits in a governmental organization. We argue the daily discursive practices of individuals can either reinforce or undermine formally stated work-family initiatives, and in turn discuss the implications of this "structuration" of policy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036002573&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036002573&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00909880216577

DO - 10.1080/00909880216577

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 50

EP - 77

JO - Journal of Applied Communication Research

JF - Journal of Applied Communication Research

SN - 0090-9882

IS - 1

ER -