The self-internationalization model (SIM) versus conventional internationalization models (CIMs) of the institutions of higher education

A preliminary insight from management perspectives

Mohammad Ayub Khan, Noam Ebner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Institutions of higher education increasingly engage in internationalization efforts for a variety of reasons. The collection of practices these institutions engage in, which can be called conventional internationalization models (CIM), primarily focus on centralized and institutionalized efforts. This paper reviews typical aspects of CIM, noting their benefits while also spotlighting the costs they entail and the open spaces they leave. The paper then introduces the self-internationalization model (SIM) as a complement and a supplement to CIM. SIM offers a less centralized approach to internationalization, focusing instead on individual initiatives taken by faculty, academic managers, and students. This paper explains the functional aspects of SIM and its comparative advantages and disadvantages vis-à-vis CIM. Furthermore, it provides guidelines for the design and implementation of comprehensive, innovative, flexible, and dynamic internationalization models combining SIM and CIM in a manner that is suitable, convenient, affordable, and beneficial for all stakeholders in higher education institutions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research
Volume5
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Internationalization
Open space
Higher education institutions
Stakeholders
Disadvantage
Costs
Comparative advantage
Managers

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Business and International Management
  • Marketing
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Strategy and Management
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Finance

Cite this

@article{aa508f370d8b43a485e86f703fcba91b,
title = "The self-internationalization model (SIM) versus conventional internationalization models (CIMs) of the institutions of higher education: A preliminary insight from management perspectives",
abstract = "Institutions of higher education increasingly engage in internationalization efforts for a variety of reasons. The collection of practices these institutions engage in, which can be called conventional internationalization models (CIM), primarily focus on centralized and institutionalized efforts. This paper reviews typical aspects of CIM, noting their benefits while also spotlighting the costs they entail and the open spaces they leave. The paper then introduces the self-internationalization model (SIM) as a complement and a supplement to CIM. SIM offers a less centralized approach to internationalization, focusing instead on individual initiatives taken by faculty, academic managers, and students. This paper explains the functional aspects of SIM and its comparative advantages and disadvantages vis-{\`a}-vis CIM. Furthermore, it provides guidelines for the design and implementation of comprehensive, innovative, flexible, and dynamic internationalization models combining SIM and CIM in a manner that is suitable, convenient, affordable, and beneficial for all stakeholders in higher education institutions.",
author = "Khan, {Mohammad Ayub} and Noam Ebner",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.15549/jeecar.v5i1.189",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
journal = "Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research",
issn = "2328-8272",
publisher = "Institute of Eastern Europe and Central Asia",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The self-internationalization model (SIM) versus conventional internationalization models (CIMs) of the institutions of higher education

T2 - A preliminary insight from management perspectives

AU - Khan, Mohammad Ayub

AU - Ebner, Noam

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Institutions of higher education increasingly engage in internationalization efforts for a variety of reasons. The collection of practices these institutions engage in, which can be called conventional internationalization models (CIM), primarily focus on centralized and institutionalized efforts. This paper reviews typical aspects of CIM, noting their benefits while also spotlighting the costs they entail and the open spaces they leave. The paper then introduces the self-internationalization model (SIM) as a complement and a supplement to CIM. SIM offers a less centralized approach to internationalization, focusing instead on individual initiatives taken by faculty, academic managers, and students. This paper explains the functional aspects of SIM and its comparative advantages and disadvantages vis-à-vis CIM. Furthermore, it provides guidelines for the design and implementation of comprehensive, innovative, flexible, and dynamic internationalization models combining SIM and CIM in a manner that is suitable, convenient, affordable, and beneficial for all stakeholders in higher education institutions.

AB - Institutions of higher education increasingly engage in internationalization efforts for a variety of reasons. The collection of practices these institutions engage in, which can be called conventional internationalization models (CIM), primarily focus on centralized and institutionalized efforts. This paper reviews typical aspects of CIM, noting their benefits while also spotlighting the costs they entail and the open spaces they leave. The paper then introduces the self-internationalization model (SIM) as a complement and a supplement to CIM. SIM offers a less centralized approach to internationalization, focusing instead on individual initiatives taken by faculty, academic managers, and students. This paper explains the functional aspects of SIM and its comparative advantages and disadvantages vis-à-vis CIM. Furthermore, it provides guidelines for the design and implementation of comprehensive, innovative, flexible, and dynamic internationalization models combining SIM and CIM in a manner that is suitable, convenient, affordable, and beneficial for all stakeholders in higher education institutions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046782185&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85046782185&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.15549/jeecar.v5i1.189

DO - 10.15549/jeecar.v5i1.189

M3 - Article

VL - 5

JO - Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research

JF - Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research

SN - 2328-8272

IS - 1

ER -