Abstract
Institutions of higher education increasingly engage in internationalization efforts for a variety of reasons. The collection of practices these institutions engage in, which can be called conventional internationalization models (CIM), primarily focus on centralized and institutionalized efforts. This paper reviews typical aspects of CIM, noting their benefits while also spotlighting the costs they entail and the open spaces they leave. The paper then introduces the self-internationalization model (SIM) as a complement and a supplement to CIM. SIM offers a less centralized approach to internationalization, focusing instead on individual initiatives taken by faculty, academic managers, and students. This paper explains the functional aspects of SIM and its comparative advantages and disadvantages vis-à-vis CIM. Furthermore, it provides guidelines for the design and implementation of comprehensive, innovative, flexible, and dynamic internationalization models combining SIM and CIM in a manner that is suitable, convenient, affordable, and beneficial for all stakeholders in higher education institutions.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Journal | Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research |
| Volume | 5 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jan 1 2018 |
Fingerprint
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Business and International Management
- Marketing
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Strategy and Management
- Economics and Econometrics
- Finance
Cite this
The self-internationalization model (SIM) versus conventional internationalization models (CIMs) of the institutions of higher education : A preliminary insight from management perspectives. / Khan, Mohammad Ayub; Ebner, Noam.
In: Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research, Vol. 5, No. 1, 01.01.2018.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - The self-internationalization model (SIM) versus conventional internationalization models (CIMs) of the institutions of higher education
T2 - A preliminary insight from management perspectives
AU - Khan, Mohammad Ayub
AU - Ebner, Noam
PY - 2018/1/1
Y1 - 2018/1/1
N2 - Institutions of higher education increasingly engage in internationalization efforts for a variety of reasons. The collection of practices these institutions engage in, which can be called conventional internationalization models (CIM), primarily focus on centralized and institutionalized efforts. This paper reviews typical aspects of CIM, noting their benefits while also spotlighting the costs they entail and the open spaces they leave. The paper then introduces the self-internationalization model (SIM) as a complement and a supplement to CIM. SIM offers a less centralized approach to internationalization, focusing instead on individual initiatives taken by faculty, academic managers, and students. This paper explains the functional aspects of SIM and its comparative advantages and disadvantages vis-à-vis CIM. Furthermore, it provides guidelines for the design and implementation of comprehensive, innovative, flexible, and dynamic internationalization models combining SIM and CIM in a manner that is suitable, convenient, affordable, and beneficial for all stakeholders in higher education institutions.
AB - Institutions of higher education increasingly engage in internationalization efforts for a variety of reasons. The collection of practices these institutions engage in, which can be called conventional internationalization models (CIM), primarily focus on centralized and institutionalized efforts. This paper reviews typical aspects of CIM, noting their benefits while also spotlighting the costs they entail and the open spaces they leave. The paper then introduces the self-internationalization model (SIM) as a complement and a supplement to CIM. SIM offers a less centralized approach to internationalization, focusing instead on individual initiatives taken by faculty, academic managers, and students. This paper explains the functional aspects of SIM and its comparative advantages and disadvantages vis-à-vis CIM. Furthermore, it provides guidelines for the design and implementation of comprehensive, innovative, flexible, and dynamic internationalization models combining SIM and CIM in a manner that is suitable, convenient, affordable, and beneficial for all stakeholders in higher education institutions.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046782185&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85046782185&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.15549/jeecar.v5i1.189
DO - 10.15549/jeecar.v5i1.189
M3 - Article
VL - 5
JO - Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research
JF - Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research
SN - 2328-8272
IS - 1
ER -