Timed up and go (TUG) test

Normative reference values for ages 20 to 59 years and relationships with physical and mental health risk factors

Breelan M. Kear, Thomas Guck, Amy McGaha

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The Timed Up and Go (TUG) test is a reliable, cost-effective, safe, and time-efficient way to evaluate overall functional mobility. However, the TUG does not have normative reference values (NRV) for individuals younger than 60 years. The purpose of this study was to establish NRV for the TUG for individuals aged between 20 and 59 years and to examine the relationship between the TUG and demographic, physical, and mental health risk factors. Methods: Two hundred participants, 50 per decade (ages 20-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59 years) were selected at their primary care visit, and timed as they performed the TUG by standing up out of a chair, walking 3 m, turning around, walking back to the chair, and sitting down. Information regarding the risk factors socioeconomic status, body mass index, an index of multimorbidities, perceptions of overall physical and mental health was obtained and used as predictors of TUG time independent of age. Results: TUG times were significantly different among the decades (F = 6.579, P =.001) with slower times occurring with the 50-year-old decade compared with the 20s (P =.001), 30s (P =.001), and 40s (P =.020). Slower TUG times were associated with lower SES, higher body mass index, more medical comorbidities, and worse perceived physical and mental health. Regression results indicated that perceived physical and mental health accounted for unique variance in the prediction of TUG time beyond age, gender, and socioeconomic status. Conclusions: This study provided TUG NRV for adults in their 20s, 30s, 40s, and 50s. The TUG may have utility for primary care providers as they assess and monitor physical activity in younger adults, especially those with physical and mental health risk factors.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)9-13
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Primary Care and Community Health
Volume8
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2017

Fingerprint

Mental Health
Reference Values
Social Class
Walking
Comorbidity
Primary Health Care
Body Mass Index
Young Adult
Demography
Exercise
Costs and Cost Analysis

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Medicine(all)
  • Community and Home Care
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

@article{00657d31e2b742e9a78235f0b43af9dc,
title = "Timed up and go (TUG) test: Normative reference values for ages 20 to 59 years and relationships with physical and mental health risk factors",
abstract = "Purpose: The Timed Up and Go (TUG) test is a reliable, cost-effective, safe, and time-efficient way to evaluate overall functional mobility. However, the TUG does not have normative reference values (NRV) for individuals younger than 60 years. The purpose of this study was to establish NRV for the TUG for individuals aged between 20 and 59 years and to examine the relationship between the TUG and demographic, physical, and mental health risk factors. Methods: Two hundred participants, 50 per decade (ages 20-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59 years) were selected at their primary care visit, and timed as they performed the TUG by standing up out of a chair, walking 3 m, turning around, walking back to the chair, and sitting down. Information regarding the risk factors socioeconomic status, body mass index, an index of multimorbidities, perceptions of overall physical and mental health was obtained and used as predictors of TUG time independent of age. Results: TUG times were significantly different among the decades (F = 6.579, P =.001) with slower times occurring with the 50-year-old decade compared with the 20s (P =.001), 30s (P =.001), and 40s (P =.020). Slower TUG times were associated with lower SES, higher body mass index, more medical comorbidities, and worse perceived physical and mental health. Regression results indicated that perceived physical and mental health accounted for unique variance in the prediction of TUG time beyond age, gender, and socioeconomic status. Conclusions: This study provided TUG NRV for adults in their 20s, 30s, 40s, and 50s. The TUG may have utility for primary care providers as they assess and monitor physical activity in younger adults, especially those with physical and mental health risk factors.",
author = "Kear, {Breelan M.} and Thomas Guck and Amy McGaha",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1177/2150131916659282",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "9--13",
journal = "Journal of primary care & community health",
issn = "2150-1319",
publisher = "Sage Periodicals Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Timed up and go (TUG) test

T2 - Normative reference values for ages 20 to 59 years and relationships with physical and mental health risk factors

AU - Kear, Breelan M.

AU - Guck, Thomas

AU - McGaha, Amy

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Purpose: The Timed Up and Go (TUG) test is a reliable, cost-effective, safe, and time-efficient way to evaluate overall functional mobility. However, the TUG does not have normative reference values (NRV) for individuals younger than 60 years. The purpose of this study was to establish NRV for the TUG for individuals aged between 20 and 59 years and to examine the relationship between the TUG and demographic, physical, and mental health risk factors. Methods: Two hundred participants, 50 per decade (ages 20-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59 years) were selected at their primary care visit, and timed as they performed the TUG by standing up out of a chair, walking 3 m, turning around, walking back to the chair, and sitting down. Information regarding the risk factors socioeconomic status, body mass index, an index of multimorbidities, perceptions of overall physical and mental health was obtained and used as predictors of TUG time independent of age. Results: TUG times were significantly different among the decades (F = 6.579, P =.001) with slower times occurring with the 50-year-old decade compared with the 20s (P =.001), 30s (P =.001), and 40s (P =.020). Slower TUG times were associated with lower SES, higher body mass index, more medical comorbidities, and worse perceived physical and mental health. Regression results indicated that perceived physical and mental health accounted for unique variance in the prediction of TUG time beyond age, gender, and socioeconomic status. Conclusions: This study provided TUG NRV for adults in their 20s, 30s, 40s, and 50s. The TUG may have utility for primary care providers as they assess and monitor physical activity in younger adults, especially those with physical and mental health risk factors.

AB - Purpose: The Timed Up and Go (TUG) test is a reliable, cost-effective, safe, and time-efficient way to evaluate overall functional mobility. However, the TUG does not have normative reference values (NRV) for individuals younger than 60 years. The purpose of this study was to establish NRV for the TUG for individuals aged between 20 and 59 years and to examine the relationship between the TUG and demographic, physical, and mental health risk factors. Methods: Two hundred participants, 50 per decade (ages 20-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59 years) were selected at their primary care visit, and timed as they performed the TUG by standing up out of a chair, walking 3 m, turning around, walking back to the chair, and sitting down. Information regarding the risk factors socioeconomic status, body mass index, an index of multimorbidities, perceptions of overall physical and mental health was obtained and used as predictors of TUG time independent of age. Results: TUG times were significantly different among the decades (F = 6.579, P =.001) with slower times occurring with the 50-year-old decade compared with the 20s (P =.001), 30s (P =.001), and 40s (P =.020). Slower TUG times were associated with lower SES, higher body mass index, more medical comorbidities, and worse perceived physical and mental health. Regression results indicated that perceived physical and mental health accounted for unique variance in the prediction of TUG time beyond age, gender, and socioeconomic status. Conclusions: This study provided TUG NRV for adults in their 20s, 30s, 40s, and 50s. The TUG may have utility for primary care providers as they assess and monitor physical activity in younger adults, especially those with physical and mental health risk factors.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85014441411&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85014441411&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/2150131916659282

DO - 10.1177/2150131916659282

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 9

EP - 13

JO - Journal of primary care & community health

JF - Journal of primary care & community health

SN - 2150-1319

IS - 1

ER -