Transparency to reduce surgical implant waste

Kiel J. Pfefferle, Matthew F. Dilisio, Brianna Patti, Stephen D. Fening, Jeffrey T. Junko

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Rising health care costs and emphasis on value have placed the onus of reducing healthcare costs on the surgeon. Methods: Financial data from 3,973 hip, knee, and shoulder arthroplasties performed at a physician owned orthopedic hospital was retrospectively reviewed over a two-year period. A wasted implant financial report was posted starting the second year of the study. Each surgeon’s performance could be identified by his peers. Results: After posting of the financial report, 1.11% of all hip and knee arthroplasty cases had a waste event compared to 1.50% during the control year. Shoulder arthroplasty waste events occurred twice as often than that observed in hip and knee arthroplasty during the study period. A decrease in waste events was observed but was not statistically significant (p = 0.30). Conclusions: Posting a non-blinded wasted implant data sheet was associated with a reduction in the number of wasted orthopedic surgical implants in this series, although the reduction was not statistically significant.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)207-210
Number of pages4
JournalCiOS Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery
Volume7
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Transparency to reduce surgical implant waste'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this