TY - JOUR
T1 - Uncertainty, scarcity and transparency
T2 - Public health ethics and risk communication in a pandemic
AU - Lowe, Abigail E.
AU - Voo, Teck Chuan
AU - Lee, Lisa M.
AU - Dineen Gillespie, Kelly K.
AU - Feig, Christy
AU - Ferdinand, Alva O.
AU - Mohapatra, Seema
AU - Brett-Major, David M.
AU - Wynia, Matthew K.
N1 - Funding Information:
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors
PY - 2022/12
Y1 - 2022/12
N2 - Communicating public health guidance is key to mitigating risk during disasters and outbreaks, and ethical guidance on communication emphasizes being fully transparent. Yet, communication during the pandemic has sometimes been fraught, due in part to practical and conceptual challenges around being transparent. A particular challenge has arisen when there was both evolving scientific knowledge on COVID-19 and reticence to acknowledge that resource scarcity concerns were influencing public health recommendations. This essay uses the example of communicating public health guidance on masking in the United States to illustrate ethical challenges of developing and conveying public health guidance under twin conditions of uncertainty and resource scarcity. Such situations require balancing two key principles in public health ethics: the precautionary principle and harm reduction. Transparency remains a bedrock value to guide risk communication, but optimizing transparency requires consideration of additional ethical values in developing and implementing risk communication strategies.
AB - Communicating public health guidance is key to mitigating risk during disasters and outbreaks, and ethical guidance on communication emphasizes being fully transparent. Yet, communication during the pandemic has sometimes been fraught, due in part to practical and conceptual challenges around being transparent. A particular challenge has arisen when there was both evolving scientific knowledge on COVID-19 and reticence to acknowledge that resource scarcity concerns were influencing public health recommendations. This essay uses the example of communicating public health guidance on masking in the United States to illustrate ethical challenges of developing and conveying public health guidance under twin conditions of uncertainty and resource scarcity. Such situations require balancing two key principles in public health ethics: the precautionary principle and harm reduction. Transparency remains a bedrock value to guide risk communication, but optimizing transparency requires consideration of additional ethical values in developing and implementing risk communication strategies.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85139012050&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85139012050&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.lana.2022.100374
DO - 10.1016/j.lana.2022.100374
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85139012050
VL - 16
JO - The Lancet Regional Health - Americas
JF - The Lancet Regional Health - Americas
SN - 2667-193X
M1 - 100374
ER -