Upper extremity strength and range of motion and their relationship to function in breast cancer survivors

Shana Harrington, Darin Padua, Claudio Battaglini, Lori A. Michener

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The impact upper extremity impairments (UE) have on UE function in breast cancer survivors (BCS) is unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the associations between upper extremity active range of motion (AROM), passive range of motion (PROM), and strength with self-reported function in BCS. BCS (n = 24) completed the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) and the Pennsylvania Shoulder Score (PSS). AROM and PROM of shoulder flexion, extension, external rotation (ER) at 0° and 90° of abduction, and internal rotation (IR) at 90° of abduction were measured using a digital inclinometer. Strength was measured using a hand-held dynamometer for scapular abduction and upward rotation, scapular depression and adduction, flexion, IR, ER, scaption, and horizontal adduction. All constructs of AROM, PROM, and strength were correlated with the DASH and PSS. DASH was moderately to highly correlated with 2 of 5 AROM, 2 of 5 PROM, and 6 of 7 shoulder strength measures. PSS was moderately to highly correlated with 2 of 5 AROM, 2 of 5 PROM, and 4 of 7 shoulder strength measures. Regression analysis showed that AROM explained 40% of the DASH scores and strength explained 20% of scores on the PSS. This study characterizes the impact that shoulder motion, flexibility, and strength losses have on shoulder function in BCS. Deficits in AROM and shoulder strength explained the greatest proportion of shoulder disability. Future clinical trials should consider incorporating AROM and strengthening techniques to improve shoulder use after breast cancer treatments.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)513-520
Number of pages8
JournalPhysiotherapy Theory and Practice
Volume29
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Articular Range of Motion
Upper Extremity
Breast Neoplasms
Arm
Hand
Hand Strength

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Upper extremity strength and range of motion and their relationship to function in breast cancer survivors. / Harrington, Shana; Padua, Darin; Battaglini, Claudio; Michener, Lori A.

In: Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, Vol. 29, No. 7, 10.2013, p. 513-520.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harrington, Shana ; Padua, Darin ; Battaglini, Claudio ; Michener, Lori A. / Upper extremity strength and range of motion and their relationship to function in breast cancer survivors. In: Physiotherapy Theory and Practice. 2013 ; Vol. 29, No. 7. pp. 513-520.
@article{d7308e0fa5054803a24f357cde6b563a,
title = "Upper extremity strength and range of motion and their relationship to function in breast cancer survivors",
abstract = "The impact upper extremity impairments (UE) have on UE function in breast cancer survivors (BCS) is unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the associations between upper extremity active range of motion (AROM), passive range of motion (PROM), and strength with self-reported function in BCS. BCS (n = 24) completed the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) and the Pennsylvania Shoulder Score (PSS). AROM and PROM of shoulder flexion, extension, external rotation (ER) at 0° and 90° of abduction, and internal rotation (IR) at 90° of abduction were measured using a digital inclinometer. Strength was measured using a hand-held dynamometer for scapular abduction and upward rotation, scapular depression and adduction, flexion, IR, ER, scaption, and horizontal adduction. All constructs of AROM, PROM, and strength were correlated with the DASH and PSS. DASH was moderately to highly correlated with 2 of 5 AROM, 2 of 5 PROM, and 6 of 7 shoulder strength measures. PSS was moderately to highly correlated with 2 of 5 AROM, 2 of 5 PROM, and 4 of 7 shoulder strength measures. Regression analysis showed that AROM explained 40{\%} of the DASH scores and strength explained 20{\%} of scores on the PSS. This study characterizes the impact that shoulder motion, flexibility, and strength losses have on shoulder function in BCS. Deficits in AROM and shoulder strength explained the greatest proportion of shoulder disability. Future clinical trials should consider incorporating AROM and strengthening techniques to improve shoulder use after breast cancer treatments.",
author = "Shana Harrington and Darin Padua and Claudio Battaglini and Michener, {Lori A.}",
year = "2013",
month = "10",
doi = "10.3109/09593985.2012.757683",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "513--520",
journal = "Physiotherapy Theory and Practice",
issn = "0959-3985",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Upper extremity strength and range of motion and their relationship to function in breast cancer survivors

AU - Harrington, Shana

AU - Padua, Darin

AU - Battaglini, Claudio

AU - Michener, Lori A.

PY - 2013/10

Y1 - 2013/10

N2 - The impact upper extremity impairments (UE) have on UE function in breast cancer survivors (BCS) is unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the associations between upper extremity active range of motion (AROM), passive range of motion (PROM), and strength with self-reported function in BCS. BCS (n = 24) completed the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) and the Pennsylvania Shoulder Score (PSS). AROM and PROM of shoulder flexion, extension, external rotation (ER) at 0° and 90° of abduction, and internal rotation (IR) at 90° of abduction were measured using a digital inclinometer. Strength was measured using a hand-held dynamometer for scapular abduction and upward rotation, scapular depression and adduction, flexion, IR, ER, scaption, and horizontal adduction. All constructs of AROM, PROM, and strength were correlated with the DASH and PSS. DASH was moderately to highly correlated with 2 of 5 AROM, 2 of 5 PROM, and 6 of 7 shoulder strength measures. PSS was moderately to highly correlated with 2 of 5 AROM, 2 of 5 PROM, and 4 of 7 shoulder strength measures. Regression analysis showed that AROM explained 40% of the DASH scores and strength explained 20% of scores on the PSS. This study characterizes the impact that shoulder motion, flexibility, and strength losses have on shoulder function in BCS. Deficits in AROM and shoulder strength explained the greatest proportion of shoulder disability. Future clinical trials should consider incorporating AROM and strengthening techniques to improve shoulder use after breast cancer treatments.

AB - The impact upper extremity impairments (UE) have on UE function in breast cancer survivors (BCS) is unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the associations between upper extremity active range of motion (AROM), passive range of motion (PROM), and strength with self-reported function in BCS. BCS (n = 24) completed the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) and the Pennsylvania Shoulder Score (PSS). AROM and PROM of shoulder flexion, extension, external rotation (ER) at 0° and 90° of abduction, and internal rotation (IR) at 90° of abduction were measured using a digital inclinometer. Strength was measured using a hand-held dynamometer for scapular abduction and upward rotation, scapular depression and adduction, flexion, IR, ER, scaption, and horizontal adduction. All constructs of AROM, PROM, and strength were correlated with the DASH and PSS. DASH was moderately to highly correlated with 2 of 5 AROM, 2 of 5 PROM, and 6 of 7 shoulder strength measures. PSS was moderately to highly correlated with 2 of 5 AROM, 2 of 5 PROM, and 4 of 7 shoulder strength measures. Regression analysis showed that AROM explained 40% of the DASH scores and strength explained 20% of scores on the PSS. This study characterizes the impact that shoulder motion, flexibility, and strength losses have on shoulder function in BCS. Deficits in AROM and shoulder strength explained the greatest proportion of shoulder disability. Future clinical trials should consider incorporating AROM and strengthening techniques to improve shoulder use after breast cancer treatments.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84883588871&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84883588871&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3109/09593985.2012.757683

DO - 10.3109/09593985.2012.757683

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 513

EP - 520

JO - Physiotherapy Theory and Practice

JF - Physiotherapy Theory and Practice

SN - 0959-3985

IS - 7

ER -