Validity of methods for estimating percent body fat in black males

Jeffrey R. Stout; Joan M. Eckerson; Terry J. Housh; Glen O. Johnson

doi:10.1519/00124278-199411000-00007

Validity of methods for estimating percent body fat in black males

Jeffrey R. Stout, Joan M. Eckerson, Terry J. Housh, Glen O. Johnson

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

This investigation examined the validity of skinfold (Sum7 and Sum3), near-infrared interactance (F5000 and FI 000), and bioelectrical impedance (BIA) equations for estimating percent body fat (% fat) in 20 black male (age = 21.0 ± 3.0 yrs) volunteers by comparing the estimates to values obtained from underwater weighing (% fat = 13.9 ± 7.0). The statistical analyses included examination of the constant error, standard error of estimate, r, and total error (TE). The results indicated that the Sum3 (TE = 2.1% fat) and Sum7 (TE = 2.4% fat) skinfold equations most accurately estimated % fat, and therefore are recommended over the F5000 (TE = 3.9% fat), FI000 (TE = 4.6% fat), and BIA (TE = 9.4% fat) equations for estimating % fat in black men.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	243-246
Number of pages	4
Journal	Journal of strength and conditioning research
Volume	8
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1519/00124278-199411000-00007
State	Published - Nov 1994
Externally published	Yes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Access to Document

10.1519/00124278-199411000-00007

Cite this

@article{e3e937bf5bcb41f6975408e714cf0892,

title = "Validity of methods for estimating percent body fat in black males",

abstract = "This investigation examined the validity of skinfold (Sum7 and Sum3), near-infrared interactance (F5000 and FI 000), and bioelectrical impedance (BIA) equations for estimating percent body fat (% fat) in 20 black male (age = 21.0 ± 3.0 yrs) volunteers by comparing the estimates to values obtained from underwater weighing (% fat = 13.9 ± 7.0). The statistical analyses included examination of the constant error, standard error of estimate, r, and total error (TE). The results indicated that the Sum3 (TE = 2.1% fat) and Sum7 (TE = 2.4% fat) skinfold equations most accurately estimated % fat, and therefore are recommended over the F5000 (TE = 3.9% fat), FI000 (TE = 4.6% fat), and BIA (TE = 9.4% fat) equations for estimating % fat in black men.",

author = "Stout, {Jeffrey R.} and Eckerson, {Joan M.} and Housh, {Terry J.} and Johnson, {Glen O.}",

year = "1994",

month = nov,

doi = "10.1519/00124278-199411000-00007",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "8",

pages = "243--246",

journal = "Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research",

issn = "1064-8011",

publisher = "NSCA National Strength and Conditioning Association",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Validity of methods for estimating percent body fat in black males

AU - Stout, Jeffrey R.

AU - Eckerson, Joan M.

AU - Housh, Terry J.

AU - Johnson, Glen O.

PY - 1994/11

Y1 - 1994/11

N2 - This investigation examined the validity of skinfold (Sum7 and Sum3), near-infrared interactance (F5000 and FI 000), and bioelectrical impedance (BIA) equations for estimating percent body fat (% fat) in 20 black male (age = 21.0 ± 3.0 yrs) volunteers by comparing the estimates to values obtained from underwater weighing (% fat = 13.9 ± 7.0). The statistical analyses included examination of the constant error, standard error of estimate, r, and total error (TE). The results indicated that the Sum3 (TE = 2.1% fat) and Sum7 (TE = 2.4% fat) skinfold equations most accurately estimated % fat, and therefore are recommended over the F5000 (TE = 3.9% fat), FI000 (TE = 4.6% fat), and BIA (TE = 9.4% fat) equations for estimating % fat in black men.

AB - This investigation examined the validity of skinfold (Sum7 and Sum3), near-infrared interactance (F5000 and FI 000), and bioelectrical impedance (BIA) equations for estimating percent body fat (% fat) in 20 black male (age = 21.0 ± 3.0 yrs) volunteers by comparing the estimates to values obtained from underwater weighing (% fat = 13.9 ± 7.0). The statistical analyses included examination of the constant error, standard error of estimate, r, and total error (TE). The results indicated that the Sum3 (TE = 2.1% fat) and Sum7 (TE = 2.4% fat) skinfold equations most accurately estimated % fat, and therefore are recommended over the F5000 (TE = 3.9% fat), FI000 (TE = 4.6% fat), and BIA (TE = 9.4% fat) equations for estimating % fat in black men.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0343751854&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0343751854&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1519/00124278-199411000-00007

DO - 10.1519/00124278-199411000-00007

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0343751854

VL - 8

SP - 243

EP - 246

JO - Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

JF - Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

SN - 1064-8011

IS - 4

ER -

Validity of methods for estimating percent body fat in black males

Abstract

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this