Validity of percent body fat estimations in males

Jeffrey R. Stout; Joan M. Eckerson; Terry J. Housh; Glen O. Johnson; Nancy M. Betts

Validity of percent body fat estimations in males

Jeffrey R. Stout, Joan M. Eckerson, Terry J. Housh, Glen O. Johnson, Nancy M. Betts

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

The present investigation examined the validity of selected skinfold (Sum3), nearinfrared interactance (F5000 and F1000), and bioelectrical impedance (BIA) equations for estimating percent body fat (% fat) in young adult males (X age ± SD = 22 ± 3 yr) by comparing the estimates with values obtained from underwater weighing. Fifty-seven Caucasian male (X % fat ± SD = 15.1 ± 6.2) volunteers served as subjects. The statistical analyses included examination of constant error (CE), standard error of estimate (SEE), r, and total error (TE). The results indicated that the Sum3 equation had the lowest SEE (2.7% fat) and TE (3.6% fat) as well as the highest validity coefficient (r = 0.90). The F5000, however, had the lowest CE (-1.0% fat). Based on these findings, the Sum3 equation is recommended over the F5000 (TE = 4.2% fat), F1000 (TE = 6.1% fat), and BIA (TE = 5.0% fat) equations for estimating % fat in young adult males.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	632-636
Number of pages	5
Journal	Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
Volume	26
Issue number	5
State	Published - May 1994
Externally published	Yes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Validity of percent body fat estimations in males'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

@article{44a24bbcd7e546e0975c32d30c307b95,

title = "Validity of percent body fat estimations in males",

abstract = "The present investigation examined the validity of selected skinfold (Sum3), nearinfrared interactance (F5000 and F1000), and bioelectrical impedance (BIA) equations for estimating percent body fat (% fat) in young adult males (X age ± SD = 22 ± 3 yr) by comparing the estimates with values obtained from underwater weighing. Fifty-seven Caucasian male (X % fat ± SD = 15.1 ± 6.2) volunteers served as subjects. The statistical analyses included examination of constant error (CE), standard error of estimate (SEE), r, and total error (TE). The results indicated that the Sum3 equation had the lowest SEE (2.7% fat) and TE (3.6% fat) as well as the highest validity coefficient (r = 0.90). The F5000, however, had the lowest CE (-1.0% fat). Based on these findings, the Sum3 equation is recommended over the F5000 (TE = 4.2% fat), F1000 (TE = 6.1% fat), and BIA (TE = 5.0% fat) equations for estimating % fat in young adult males.",

author = "Stout, {Jeffrey R.} and Eckerson, {Joan M.} and Housh, {Terry J.} and Johnson, {Glen O.} and Betts, {Nancy M.}",

year = "1994",

month = may,

language = "English (US)",

volume = "26",

pages = "632--636",

journal = "Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise",

issn = "0195-9131",

publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",

number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Validity of percent body fat estimations in males

AU - Stout, Jeffrey R.

AU - Eckerson, Joan M.

AU - Housh, Terry J.

AU - Johnson, Glen O.

AU - Betts, Nancy M.

PY - 1994/5

Y1 - 1994/5

N2 - The present investigation examined the validity of selected skinfold (Sum3), nearinfrared interactance (F5000 and F1000), and bioelectrical impedance (BIA) equations for estimating percent body fat (% fat) in young adult males (X age ± SD = 22 ± 3 yr) by comparing the estimates with values obtained from underwater weighing. Fifty-seven Caucasian male (X % fat ± SD = 15.1 ± 6.2) volunteers served as subjects. The statistical analyses included examination of constant error (CE), standard error of estimate (SEE), r, and total error (TE). The results indicated that the Sum3 equation had the lowest SEE (2.7% fat) and TE (3.6% fat) as well as the highest validity coefficient (r = 0.90). The F5000, however, had the lowest CE (-1.0% fat). Based on these findings, the Sum3 equation is recommended over the F5000 (TE = 4.2% fat), F1000 (TE = 6.1% fat), and BIA (TE = 5.0% fat) equations for estimating % fat in young adult males.

AB - The present investigation examined the validity of selected skinfold (Sum3), nearinfrared interactance (F5000 and F1000), and bioelectrical impedance (BIA) equations for estimating percent body fat (% fat) in young adult males (X age ± SD = 22 ± 3 yr) by comparing the estimates with values obtained from underwater weighing. Fifty-seven Caucasian male (X % fat ± SD = 15.1 ± 6.2) volunteers served as subjects. The statistical analyses included examination of constant error (CE), standard error of estimate (SEE), r, and total error (TE). The results indicated that the Sum3 equation had the lowest SEE (2.7% fat) and TE (3.6% fat) as well as the highest validity coefficient (r = 0.90). The F5000, however, had the lowest CE (-1.0% fat). Based on these findings, the Sum3 equation is recommended over the F5000 (TE = 4.2% fat), F1000 (TE = 6.1% fat), and BIA (TE = 5.0% fat) equations for estimating % fat in young adult males.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028351840&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028351840&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 8007813

AN - SCOPUS:0028351840

VL - 26

SP - 632

EP - 636

JO - Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise

JF - Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise

SN - 0195-9131

IS - 5

ER -

Validity of percent body fat estimations in males

Abstract

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Other files and links

Cite this