Validity of radiographic measurement of interproximal bone loss

Peter Eickholz, Ti Sun Kim, Douglas Benn, Hans J. Staehle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to compare radiographic assessment of interproximal bone loss using a loupe with a 0.1 mm calibrated grid and a computer-assisted analysis system (LMSRT). In 35 patients suffering from untreated advanced periodontal disease, 62 standardized radiographs were taken presurgically. The horizontal and vertical angulation difference of the central beam from the orthoradial projection was calculated for each radiograph. At the time of surgery, for 115 interproximal defects, the distances from the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) to alveolar crest (AC), and CEJ to bottom of the bony defect (BD) were measured. In all radiographs, the linear distances CEJ to AC, and CEJ to BD were assessed using a loupe and LMSRT. Comparison between radiographic and intrasurgical assessments was performed using paired t-tests. A stepwise multiple linear regression analysis was used to evaluate factors that influence the discrepancy between radiographic and intrasurgical measurements. Both analyzing techniques underestimated interproximal bone loss as compared with intrasurgical measurements (CEJ-AC: loupe: 0.86 ± 1.84 mm [p<0.001]; LMSRT: 0.58 ± 1.86 mm [p <0.005]; CEJ-BD: loupe: 1.22 ± 2.33 mm [p <0.001]; LMSRT: 0.80 ±2.09 mm [p <0.001]). LMSRT underestimated interproximal bone loss significantly less than the loupe (p <0.001). The difference between LMSRT and intrasurgical assessments was modulated by the factors of vertical and horizontal angulation difference and defect depth (p <0.1). Orthoradial projection reduced underestimation of radiographic, assessment of bone, loss. LMSRT underestimated interproximal bone loss to a lesser extent than conventional evaluation by loupe.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)99-106
Number of pages8
JournalOral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontics
Volume85
Issue number1
StatePublished - 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Tooth Cervix
Bone and Bones
Periodontal Diseases
Linear Models
Regression Analysis

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Surgery
  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Validity of radiographic measurement of interproximal bone loss. / Eickholz, Peter; Kim, Ti Sun; Benn, Douglas; Staehle, Hans J.

In: Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontics, Vol. 85, No. 1, 1998, p. 99-106.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a0075cfefd3041c38e4bbdb47928397e,
title = "Validity of radiographic measurement of interproximal bone loss",
abstract = "The aim of the present study was to compare radiographic assessment of interproximal bone loss using a loupe with a 0.1 mm calibrated grid and a computer-assisted analysis system (LMSRT). In 35 patients suffering from untreated advanced periodontal disease, 62 standardized radiographs were taken presurgically. The horizontal and vertical angulation difference of the central beam from the orthoradial projection was calculated for each radiograph. At the time of surgery, for 115 interproximal defects, the distances from the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) to alveolar crest (AC), and CEJ to bottom of the bony defect (BD) were measured. In all radiographs, the linear distances CEJ to AC, and CEJ to BD were assessed using a loupe and LMSRT. Comparison between radiographic and intrasurgical assessments was performed using paired t-tests. A stepwise multiple linear regression analysis was used to evaluate factors that influence the discrepancy between radiographic and intrasurgical measurements. Both analyzing techniques underestimated interproximal bone loss as compared with intrasurgical measurements (CEJ-AC: loupe: 0.86 ± 1.84 mm [p<0.001]; LMSRT: 0.58 ± 1.86 mm [p <0.005]; CEJ-BD: loupe: 1.22 ± 2.33 mm [p <0.001]; LMSRT: 0.80 ±2.09 mm [p <0.001]). LMSRT underestimated interproximal bone loss significantly less than the loupe (p <0.001). The difference between LMSRT and intrasurgical assessments was modulated by the factors of vertical and horizontal angulation difference and defect depth (p <0.1). Orthoradial projection reduced underestimation of radiographic, assessment of bone, loss. LMSRT underestimated interproximal bone loss to a lesser extent than conventional evaluation by loupe.",
author = "Peter Eickholz and Kim, {Ti Sun} and Douglas Benn and Staehle, {Hans J.}",
year = "1998",
language = "English",
volume = "85",
pages = "99--106",
journal = "Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology",
issn = "2212-4403",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Validity of radiographic measurement of interproximal bone loss

AU - Eickholz, Peter

AU - Kim, Ti Sun

AU - Benn, Douglas

AU - Staehle, Hans J.

PY - 1998

Y1 - 1998

N2 - The aim of the present study was to compare radiographic assessment of interproximal bone loss using a loupe with a 0.1 mm calibrated grid and a computer-assisted analysis system (LMSRT). In 35 patients suffering from untreated advanced periodontal disease, 62 standardized radiographs were taken presurgically. The horizontal and vertical angulation difference of the central beam from the orthoradial projection was calculated for each radiograph. At the time of surgery, for 115 interproximal defects, the distances from the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) to alveolar crest (AC), and CEJ to bottom of the bony defect (BD) were measured. In all radiographs, the linear distances CEJ to AC, and CEJ to BD were assessed using a loupe and LMSRT. Comparison between radiographic and intrasurgical assessments was performed using paired t-tests. A stepwise multiple linear regression analysis was used to evaluate factors that influence the discrepancy between radiographic and intrasurgical measurements. Both analyzing techniques underestimated interproximal bone loss as compared with intrasurgical measurements (CEJ-AC: loupe: 0.86 ± 1.84 mm [p<0.001]; LMSRT: 0.58 ± 1.86 mm [p <0.005]; CEJ-BD: loupe: 1.22 ± 2.33 mm [p <0.001]; LMSRT: 0.80 ±2.09 mm [p <0.001]). LMSRT underestimated interproximal bone loss significantly less than the loupe (p <0.001). The difference between LMSRT and intrasurgical assessments was modulated by the factors of vertical and horizontal angulation difference and defect depth (p <0.1). Orthoradial projection reduced underestimation of radiographic, assessment of bone, loss. LMSRT underestimated interproximal bone loss to a lesser extent than conventional evaluation by loupe.

AB - The aim of the present study was to compare radiographic assessment of interproximal bone loss using a loupe with a 0.1 mm calibrated grid and a computer-assisted analysis system (LMSRT). In 35 patients suffering from untreated advanced periodontal disease, 62 standardized radiographs were taken presurgically. The horizontal and vertical angulation difference of the central beam from the orthoradial projection was calculated for each radiograph. At the time of surgery, for 115 interproximal defects, the distances from the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) to alveolar crest (AC), and CEJ to bottom of the bony defect (BD) were measured. In all radiographs, the linear distances CEJ to AC, and CEJ to BD were assessed using a loupe and LMSRT. Comparison between radiographic and intrasurgical assessments was performed using paired t-tests. A stepwise multiple linear regression analysis was used to evaluate factors that influence the discrepancy between radiographic and intrasurgical measurements. Both analyzing techniques underestimated interproximal bone loss as compared with intrasurgical measurements (CEJ-AC: loupe: 0.86 ± 1.84 mm [p<0.001]; LMSRT: 0.58 ± 1.86 mm [p <0.005]; CEJ-BD: loupe: 1.22 ± 2.33 mm [p <0.001]; LMSRT: 0.80 ±2.09 mm [p <0.001]). LMSRT underestimated interproximal bone loss significantly less than the loupe (p <0.001). The difference between LMSRT and intrasurgical assessments was modulated by the factors of vertical and horizontal angulation difference and defect depth (p <0.1). Orthoradial projection reduced underestimation of radiographic, assessment of bone, loss. LMSRT underestimated interproximal bone loss to a lesser extent than conventional evaluation by loupe.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031608670&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031608670&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 9474623

AN - SCOPUS:0031608670

VL - 85

SP - 99

EP - 106

JO - Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology

JF - Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology

SN - 2212-4403

IS - 1

ER -