Validity of self-assessment techniques for estimating percent fat in men and women

Joan Eckerson, Jeffrey R. Stout, Tammy K. Evetovich, Terry J. Housh, Glen O. Johnson, Nicholas Worrell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study examined the validity of the Accu-Measure™ (AM) and the Futrex 1000 (F-1000) for estimating % body fat (BF) by comparing the estimates to values obtained from skinfold equations (Sum3). Thirty Caucasian men (age 23±3 yrs) and 26 Caucasian women (21±2 yrs) participated in the study. Subjects practiced, then determined their %BF using the AM and the F-1000, while skinfold sites from the Sum3 equations (men = abdomen, chest, thigh; women = triceps, suprailiac, thigh) were measured by an experienced investigator with a Lange caliper. The validity (vs. underwater weighing) for each procedure was determined by examining the constant error (CE), standard error of the estimate, r, and total error (TE). The results were similar for both genders and indicated that the AM, which resulted in the lowest TE values and nonsignificant (p>0.02) CE values, was as accurate as the Sum3 equations for estimating %BF, and is recommended over the F-1000 for self-assessments of body composition.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)243-247
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Volume12
Issue number4
StatePublished - Nov 1998

Fingerprint

Adipose Tissue
Fats
Thigh
Body Composition
Abdomen
Thorax
Research Personnel
Self-Assessment

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Eckerson, J., Stout, J. R., Evetovich, T. K., Housh, T. J., Johnson, G. O., & Worrell, N. (1998). Validity of self-assessment techniques for estimating percent fat in men and women. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 12(4), 243-247.

Validity of self-assessment techniques for estimating percent fat in men and women. / Eckerson, Joan; Stout, Jeffrey R.; Evetovich, Tammy K.; Housh, Terry J.; Johnson, Glen O.; Worrell, Nicholas.

In: Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, Vol. 12, No. 4, 11.1998, p. 243-247.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Eckerson, J, Stout, JR, Evetovich, TK, Housh, TJ, Johnson, GO & Worrell, N 1998, 'Validity of self-assessment techniques for estimating percent fat in men and women', Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 243-247.
Eckerson, Joan ; Stout, Jeffrey R. ; Evetovich, Tammy K. ; Housh, Terry J. ; Johnson, Glen O. ; Worrell, Nicholas. / Validity of self-assessment techniques for estimating percent fat in men and women. In: Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 1998 ; Vol. 12, No. 4. pp. 243-247.
@article{d5515bee986142729c26ee71cdfd563b,
title = "Validity of self-assessment techniques for estimating percent fat in men and women",
abstract = "This study examined the validity of the Accu-Measure™ (AM) and the Futrex 1000 (F-1000) for estimating {\%} body fat (BF) by comparing the estimates to values obtained from skinfold equations (Sum3). Thirty Caucasian men (age 23±3 yrs) and 26 Caucasian women (21±2 yrs) participated in the study. Subjects practiced, then determined their {\%}BF using the AM and the F-1000, while skinfold sites from the Sum3 equations (men = abdomen, chest, thigh; women = triceps, suprailiac, thigh) were measured by an experienced investigator with a Lange caliper. The validity (vs. underwater weighing) for each procedure was determined by examining the constant error (CE), standard error of the estimate, r, and total error (TE). The results were similar for both genders and indicated that the AM, which resulted in the lowest TE values and nonsignificant (p>0.02) CE values, was as accurate as the Sum3 equations for estimating {\%}BF, and is recommended over the F-1000 for self-assessments of body composition.",
author = "Joan Eckerson and Stout, {Jeffrey R.} and Evetovich, {Tammy K.} and Housh, {Terry J.} and Johnson, {Glen O.} and Nicholas Worrell",
year = "1998",
month = "11",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "243--247",
journal = "Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research",
issn = "1064-8011",
publisher = "NSCA National Strength and Conditioning Association",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Validity of self-assessment techniques for estimating percent fat in men and women

AU - Eckerson, Joan

AU - Stout, Jeffrey R.

AU - Evetovich, Tammy K.

AU - Housh, Terry J.

AU - Johnson, Glen O.

AU - Worrell, Nicholas

PY - 1998/11

Y1 - 1998/11

N2 - This study examined the validity of the Accu-Measure™ (AM) and the Futrex 1000 (F-1000) for estimating % body fat (BF) by comparing the estimates to values obtained from skinfold equations (Sum3). Thirty Caucasian men (age 23±3 yrs) and 26 Caucasian women (21±2 yrs) participated in the study. Subjects practiced, then determined their %BF using the AM and the F-1000, while skinfold sites from the Sum3 equations (men = abdomen, chest, thigh; women = triceps, suprailiac, thigh) were measured by an experienced investigator with a Lange caliper. The validity (vs. underwater weighing) for each procedure was determined by examining the constant error (CE), standard error of the estimate, r, and total error (TE). The results were similar for both genders and indicated that the AM, which resulted in the lowest TE values and nonsignificant (p>0.02) CE values, was as accurate as the Sum3 equations for estimating %BF, and is recommended over the F-1000 for self-assessments of body composition.

AB - This study examined the validity of the Accu-Measure™ (AM) and the Futrex 1000 (F-1000) for estimating % body fat (BF) by comparing the estimates to values obtained from skinfold equations (Sum3). Thirty Caucasian men (age 23±3 yrs) and 26 Caucasian women (21±2 yrs) participated in the study. Subjects practiced, then determined their %BF using the AM and the F-1000, while skinfold sites from the Sum3 equations (men = abdomen, chest, thigh; women = triceps, suprailiac, thigh) were measured by an experienced investigator with a Lange caliper. The validity (vs. underwater weighing) for each procedure was determined by examining the constant error (CE), standard error of the estimate, r, and total error (TE). The results were similar for both genders and indicated that the AM, which resulted in the lowest TE values and nonsignificant (p>0.02) CE values, was as accurate as the Sum3 equations for estimating %BF, and is recommended over the F-1000 for self-assessments of body composition.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032327320&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032327320&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0032327320

VL - 12

SP - 243

EP - 247

JO - Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

JF - Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

SN - 1064-8011

IS - 4

ER -