Value of complete cervical helical computed tomographic scanning in identifying cervical spine injury in the unevaluable blunt trauma patient with multiple injuries: A prospective study

John D. Berne, George C. Velmahos, Qalid El-Tawil, Demetrios Demetriades, Juan A. Asensio, James A. Murray, Edward E. Cornwell, Howard Belzberg, Thomas V. Berne

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

205 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the role of routine helical computed tomographic (CT) scan of the entire cervical spine in high-risk patients with multiple injuries. Methods: Prospective study of patients with severe blunt multiple injuries, requiring intensive care unit admission and CT scan of another body area besides the cervical spine. All patients were evaluated by means of standard cervical spine radiography. A complete cervical spine CT scan was performed during the same trip to the scanner in which other body areas were evaluated. The plain films and the CT scans were read by a radiologist in a blinded manner. Results: Fifty-eight patients fulfilled the criteria for inclusion in the study. The mean Glasgow Coma Scale score was 8.9 and the mean Injury Severity Score was 24.1. Twenty patients (34.4%) had cervical spine injuries (12 stable and 8 unstable injuries). Plain radiography missed eight injuries (including three unstable) and its sensitivity was 60%, specificity 100%, positive predictive value 100%, and negative predictive value 85.1%. The helical CT scan missed two spinal injuries (both stable) and its sensitivity was 90%, specificity was 100%, positive predictive value = 100%, negative predictive value = 95%. Conclusion: There is a high incidence of cervical spine injuries in the severe, blunt, multiple-injury, unevaluable patients requiring intensive care unit admission. Plain radiography alone is not reliable in diagnosing many cervical spine injuries. Complete cervical spiral computed tomography is superior to plain radiography. It is suggested that in this selected group of patients, both plain radiography and spiral computed tomography should be performed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)896-903
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care
Volume47
Issue number5
StatePublished - Nov 1999
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Multiple Trauma
Spine
Prospective Studies
Radiography
Wounds and Injuries
Nonpenetrating Wounds
Spiral Computed Tomography
Intensive Care Units
Spinal Injuries
Glasgow Coma Scale
Injury Severity Score
Motion Pictures
Incidence

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery

Cite this

Value of complete cervical helical computed tomographic scanning in identifying cervical spine injury in the unevaluable blunt trauma patient with multiple injuries : A prospective study. / Berne, John D.; Velmahos, George C.; El-Tawil, Qalid; Demetriades, Demetrios; Asensio, Juan A.; Murray, James A.; Cornwell, Edward E.; Belzberg, Howard; Berne, Thomas V.

In: Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care, Vol. 47, No. 5, 11.1999, p. 896-903.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Berne, John D. ; Velmahos, George C. ; El-Tawil, Qalid ; Demetriades, Demetrios ; Asensio, Juan A. ; Murray, James A. ; Cornwell, Edward E. ; Belzberg, Howard ; Berne, Thomas V. / Value of complete cervical helical computed tomographic scanning in identifying cervical spine injury in the unevaluable blunt trauma patient with multiple injuries : A prospective study. In: Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care. 1999 ; Vol. 47, No. 5. pp. 896-903.
@article{8a3cab9b686d44319e40d739d49f421c,
title = "Value of complete cervical helical computed tomographic scanning in identifying cervical spine injury in the unevaluable blunt trauma patient with multiple injuries: A prospective study",
abstract = "Objective: To evaluate the role of routine helical computed tomographic (CT) scan of the entire cervical spine in high-risk patients with multiple injuries. Methods: Prospective study of patients with severe blunt multiple injuries, requiring intensive care unit admission and CT scan of another body area besides the cervical spine. All patients were evaluated by means of standard cervical spine radiography. A complete cervical spine CT scan was performed during the same trip to the scanner in which other body areas were evaluated. The plain films and the CT scans were read by a radiologist in a blinded manner. Results: Fifty-eight patients fulfilled the criteria for inclusion in the study. The mean Glasgow Coma Scale score was 8.9 and the mean Injury Severity Score was 24.1. Twenty patients (34.4{\%}) had cervical spine injuries (12 stable and 8 unstable injuries). Plain radiography missed eight injuries (including three unstable) and its sensitivity was 60{\%}, specificity 100{\%}, positive predictive value 100{\%}, and negative predictive value 85.1{\%}. The helical CT scan missed two spinal injuries (both stable) and its sensitivity was 90{\%}, specificity was 100{\%}, positive predictive value = 100{\%}, negative predictive value = 95{\%}. Conclusion: There is a high incidence of cervical spine injuries in the severe, blunt, multiple-injury, unevaluable patients requiring intensive care unit admission. Plain radiography alone is not reliable in diagnosing many cervical spine injuries. Complete cervical spiral computed tomography is superior to plain radiography. It is suggested that in this selected group of patients, both plain radiography and spiral computed tomography should be performed.",
author = "Berne, {John D.} and Velmahos, {George C.} and Qalid El-Tawil and Demetrios Demetriades and Asensio, {Juan A.} and Murray, {James A.} and Cornwell, {Edward E.} and Howard Belzberg and Berne, {Thomas V.}",
year = "1999",
month = "11",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "896--903",
journal = "Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery",
issn = "2163-0755",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Value of complete cervical helical computed tomographic scanning in identifying cervical spine injury in the unevaluable blunt trauma patient with multiple injuries

T2 - A prospective study

AU - Berne, John D.

AU - Velmahos, George C.

AU - El-Tawil, Qalid

AU - Demetriades, Demetrios

AU - Asensio, Juan A.

AU - Murray, James A.

AU - Cornwell, Edward E.

AU - Belzberg, Howard

AU - Berne, Thomas V.

PY - 1999/11

Y1 - 1999/11

N2 - Objective: To evaluate the role of routine helical computed tomographic (CT) scan of the entire cervical spine in high-risk patients with multiple injuries. Methods: Prospective study of patients with severe blunt multiple injuries, requiring intensive care unit admission and CT scan of another body area besides the cervical spine. All patients were evaluated by means of standard cervical spine radiography. A complete cervical spine CT scan was performed during the same trip to the scanner in which other body areas were evaluated. The plain films and the CT scans were read by a radiologist in a blinded manner. Results: Fifty-eight patients fulfilled the criteria for inclusion in the study. The mean Glasgow Coma Scale score was 8.9 and the mean Injury Severity Score was 24.1. Twenty patients (34.4%) had cervical spine injuries (12 stable and 8 unstable injuries). Plain radiography missed eight injuries (including three unstable) and its sensitivity was 60%, specificity 100%, positive predictive value 100%, and negative predictive value 85.1%. The helical CT scan missed two spinal injuries (both stable) and its sensitivity was 90%, specificity was 100%, positive predictive value = 100%, negative predictive value = 95%. Conclusion: There is a high incidence of cervical spine injuries in the severe, blunt, multiple-injury, unevaluable patients requiring intensive care unit admission. Plain radiography alone is not reliable in diagnosing many cervical spine injuries. Complete cervical spiral computed tomography is superior to plain radiography. It is suggested that in this selected group of patients, both plain radiography and spiral computed tomography should be performed.

AB - Objective: To evaluate the role of routine helical computed tomographic (CT) scan of the entire cervical spine in high-risk patients with multiple injuries. Methods: Prospective study of patients with severe blunt multiple injuries, requiring intensive care unit admission and CT scan of another body area besides the cervical spine. All patients were evaluated by means of standard cervical spine radiography. A complete cervical spine CT scan was performed during the same trip to the scanner in which other body areas were evaluated. The plain films and the CT scans were read by a radiologist in a blinded manner. Results: Fifty-eight patients fulfilled the criteria for inclusion in the study. The mean Glasgow Coma Scale score was 8.9 and the mean Injury Severity Score was 24.1. Twenty patients (34.4%) had cervical spine injuries (12 stable and 8 unstable injuries). Plain radiography missed eight injuries (including three unstable) and its sensitivity was 60%, specificity 100%, positive predictive value 100%, and negative predictive value 85.1%. The helical CT scan missed two spinal injuries (both stable) and its sensitivity was 90%, specificity was 100%, positive predictive value = 100%, negative predictive value = 95%. Conclusion: There is a high incidence of cervical spine injuries in the severe, blunt, multiple-injury, unevaluable patients requiring intensive care unit admission. Plain radiography alone is not reliable in diagnosing many cervical spine injuries. Complete cervical spiral computed tomography is superior to plain radiography. It is suggested that in this selected group of patients, both plain radiography and spiral computed tomography should be performed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032707459&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032707459&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 10568719

AN - SCOPUS:0032707459

VL - 47

SP - 896

EP - 903

JO - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

JF - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

SN - 2163-0755

IS - 5

ER -