Vitamin D and bone health-discussion points following the recent institute of medicine recommendations

Robert P. Heaney

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The 2011 Institute of Medicine recommendations for vitamin D-both the recommended daily amount (RDA) and the vitamin D status judged adequate for bone health-are too low. Calcium absorption, osteoporotic fracture risk reduction, and healing of histological osteomalacia all require values above 30 ng/ml, and probably even 40 ng/ml. Furthermore, the proposed RDA (600 international units per day up to the age of 70) is not compatible with the blood level of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (i.e., 20 ng/ml) recommended in the same report. Concerns regarding adverse consequences of higher intakes or status levels can be dismissed, in view of our extensive experience with outdoor summer workers(who regularly have values of 60 ng/ml or more) and the virtual certainty that human physiology evolved in-and is attuned to-an environment providing 10,000 IU/day or more.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)57-60
Number of pages4
JournalEuropean Endocrinology
Volume8
Issue number1
StatePublished - 2012

Fingerprint

National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine (U.S.) Health and Medicine Division
Vitamin D
Bone and Bones
Osteomalacia
Fracture Fixation
Osteoporotic Fractures
Fracture Healing
Health
Risk Reduction Behavior
Calcium
25-hydroxyvitamin D

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Endocrinology
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems

Cite this

Vitamin D and bone health-discussion points following the recent institute of medicine recommendations. / Heaney, Robert P.

In: European Endocrinology, Vol. 8, No. 1, 2012, p. 57-60.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{cd5efad96d3947a1a78555a8530da174,
title = "Vitamin D and bone health-discussion points following the recent institute of medicine recommendations",
abstract = "The 2011 Institute of Medicine recommendations for vitamin D-both the recommended daily amount (RDA) and the vitamin D status judged adequate for bone health-are too low. Calcium absorption, osteoporotic fracture risk reduction, and healing of histological osteomalacia all require values above 30 ng/ml, and probably even 40 ng/ml. Furthermore, the proposed RDA (600 international units per day up to the age of 70) is not compatible with the blood level of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (i.e., 20 ng/ml) recommended in the same report. Concerns regarding adverse consequences of higher intakes or status levels can be dismissed, in view of our extensive experience with outdoor summer workers(who regularly have values of 60 ng/ml or more) and the virtual certainty that human physiology evolved in-and is attuned to-an environment providing 10,000 IU/day or more.",
author = "Heaney, {Robert P.}",
year = "2012",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "57--60",
journal = "European Endocrinology",
issn = "1758-3772",
publisher = "Touch Briefings",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Vitamin D and bone health-discussion points following the recent institute of medicine recommendations

AU - Heaney, Robert P.

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - The 2011 Institute of Medicine recommendations for vitamin D-both the recommended daily amount (RDA) and the vitamin D status judged adequate for bone health-are too low. Calcium absorption, osteoporotic fracture risk reduction, and healing of histological osteomalacia all require values above 30 ng/ml, and probably even 40 ng/ml. Furthermore, the proposed RDA (600 international units per day up to the age of 70) is not compatible with the blood level of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (i.e., 20 ng/ml) recommended in the same report. Concerns regarding adverse consequences of higher intakes or status levels can be dismissed, in view of our extensive experience with outdoor summer workers(who regularly have values of 60 ng/ml or more) and the virtual certainty that human physiology evolved in-and is attuned to-an environment providing 10,000 IU/day or more.

AB - The 2011 Institute of Medicine recommendations for vitamin D-both the recommended daily amount (RDA) and the vitamin D status judged adequate for bone health-are too low. Calcium absorption, osteoporotic fracture risk reduction, and healing of histological osteomalacia all require values above 30 ng/ml, and probably even 40 ng/ml. Furthermore, the proposed RDA (600 international units per day up to the age of 70) is not compatible with the blood level of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (i.e., 20 ng/ml) recommended in the same report. Concerns regarding adverse consequences of higher intakes or status levels can be dismissed, in view of our extensive experience with outdoor summer workers(who regularly have values of 60 ng/ml or more) and the virtual certainty that human physiology evolved in-and is attuned to-an environment providing 10,000 IU/day or more.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84872826772&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84872826772&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84872826772

VL - 8

SP - 57

EP - 60

JO - European Endocrinology

JF - European Endocrinology

SN - 1758-3772

IS - 1

ER -