What health science students learn from playing a standardized patient in an ethics course

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Formal teaching of ethics in health science programs at the entry level and postprofessional level in the United States and Canada has been documented in the professional literature for more than 30 years, yet there are significant differences in the way it is taught and how much time is devoted to the subject. Numerous teaching and evaluation methods have been used in ethics education, such as lectures, written examinations, debates, role-playing, small group discussion, and case study analysis. Most instruction in ethics in the health sciences has been geared toward ethical analysis of case studies, that is, the student is asked to read a case or discuss a case with others, identify the ethical issues verbally or in writing, propose different resolutions supported by principles and theory, and select the best course of action. Yet, analysis of a case is an unlikely route to develop skills in coping with the uncertainty and emotional nature of ethical issues commonly encountered in clinical practice, nor does it give us an indication of what students would really do when they encounter an actual ethical problem. There is clearly a difference between reading a text or listening to a description of a particularly difficult case involving ethical issues and interacting with a real patient or another health professional.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)481-487
Number of pages7
JournalCambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics
Volume19
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2010

Fingerprint

health science
Ethics
moral philosophy
Students
Health
entry level
student
Teaching
health professionals
group discussion
small group
indication
coping
Ethical Analysis
uncertainty
Role Playing
Canada
instruction
examination
Psychological Adaptation

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Health Policy
  • Health(social science)
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects

Cite this

What health science students learn from playing a standardized patient in an ethics course. / Haddad, Amy M.

In: Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, Vol. 19, No. 4, 10.2010, p. 481-487.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e02bfe78bbcc4d6d98081bbf3fe1bfac,
title = "What health science students learn from playing a standardized patient in an ethics course",
abstract = "Formal teaching of ethics in health science programs at the entry level and postprofessional level in the United States and Canada has been documented in the professional literature for more than 30 years, yet there are significant differences in the way it is taught and how much time is devoted to the subject. Numerous teaching and evaluation methods have been used in ethics education, such as lectures, written examinations, debates, role-playing, small group discussion, and case study analysis. Most instruction in ethics in the health sciences has been geared toward ethical analysis of case studies, that is, the student is asked to read a case or discuss a case with others, identify the ethical issues verbally or in writing, propose different resolutions supported by principles and theory, and select the best course of action. Yet, analysis of a case is an unlikely route to develop skills in coping with the uncertainty and emotional nature of ethical issues commonly encountered in clinical practice, nor does it give us an indication of what students would really do when they encounter an actual ethical problem. There is clearly a difference between reading a text or listening to a description of a particularly difficult case involving ethical issues and interacting with a real patient or another health professional.",
author = "Haddad, {Amy M.}",
year = "2010",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1017/S096318011000037X",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "481--487",
journal = "Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics",
issn = "0963-1801",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What health science students learn from playing a standardized patient in an ethics course

AU - Haddad, Amy M.

PY - 2010/10

Y1 - 2010/10

N2 - Formal teaching of ethics in health science programs at the entry level and postprofessional level in the United States and Canada has been documented in the professional literature for more than 30 years, yet there are significant differences in the way it is taught and how much time is devoted to the subject. Numerous teaching and evaluation methods have been used in ethics education, such as lectures, written examinations, debates, role-playing, small group discussion, and case study analysis. Most instruction in ethics in the health sciences has been geared toward ethical analysis of case studies, that is, the student is asked to read a case or discuss a case with others, identify the ethical issues verbally or in writing, propose different resolutions supported by principles and theory, and select the best course of action. Yet, analysis of a case is an unlikely route to develop skills in coping with the uncertainty and emotional nature of ethical issues commonly encountered in clinical practice, nor does it give us an indication of what students would really do when they encounter an actual ethical problem. There is clearly a difference between reading a text or listening to a description of a particularly difficult case involving ethical issues and interacting with a real patient or another health professional.

AB - Formal teaching of ethics in health science programs at the entry level and postprofessional level in the United States and Canada has been documented in the professional literature for more than 30 years, yet there are significant differences in the way it is taught and how much time is devoted to the subject. Numerous teaching and evaluation methods have been used in ethics education, such as lectures, written examinations, debates, role-playing, small group discussion, and case study analysis. Most instruction in ethics in the health sciences has been geared toward ethical analysis of case studies, that is, the student is asked to read a case or discuss a case with others, identify the ethical issues verbally or in writing, propose different resolutions supported by principles and theory, and select the best course of action. Yet, analysis of a case is an unlikely route to develop skills in coping with the uncertainty and emotional nature of ethical issues commonly encountered in clinical practice, nor does it give us an indication of what students would really do when they encounter an actual ethical problem. There is clearly a difference between reading a text or listening to a description of a particularly difficult case involving ethical issues and interacting with a real patient or another health professional.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77957731679&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77957731679&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S096318011000037X

DO - 10.1017/S096318011000037X

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 481

EP - 487

JO - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics

JF - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics

SN - 0963-1801

IS - 4

ER -