What is collaborative reasoning?

Ian Edwards, Mark Jones, Joy Higgs, Franziska Trede, Gail Jensen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

49 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Most physiotherapists would agree the need to establish effective working relationships with their patients in order to achieve successful outcomes in therapy. Collaboration, as an entity in clinical practice, has continued to increase in importance due to a changing climate of healthcare. Traditional models of physiotherapy treatment based on the medical model and delivered in acute settings are giving way to newer models of practice, such as health promotion, that are patient or client centred and increasingly located in community settings. At the same time, the notion of patient compliance with physiotherapy advice and exercises, deriving from a medical model of practice, is being superseded by the notion of collaborative decision making (or reasoning) in physiotherapy. Recent physiotherapy literature suggests that collaborative decision making is an advanced clinical skill, while also casting doubt on just how well or consistently physiotherapists are able to set goals with their patients and nurture a collaborative approach in working towards those goals. The purpose of this article is to demonstrate how clinical reasoning is an ideal vehicle by which physiotherapy practitioners can reflect on the process of collaboration with their patients in clinical practice. Three particular forms of collaboration are identified which can be traced to different assumptions about knowledge and how this knowledge is both generated and used by practitioners in clinical practice. In this paper, we argue that these different forms of collaboration each have an important role in clinical practice as they address both the diversity and underlying nature of those treatment goals that may be seen as desirable from the perspective of either practitioner or patient. In turn, these forms of collaboration assist in the development of a variety of knowledge and skills for both practitioners and patients alike.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)70-83
Number of pages14
JournalAdvances in Physiotherapy
Volume6
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2004

Fingerprint

Physical Therapists
Decision Making
Clinical Competence
Patient Compliance
Health Promotion
Climate
Therapeutics
Exercise
Delivery of Health Care

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

What is collaborative reasoning? / Edwards, Ian; Jones, Mark; Higgs, Joy; Trede, Franziska; Jensen, Gail.

In: Advances in Physiotherapy, Vol. 6, No. 2, 2004, p. 70-83.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Edwards, I, Jones, M, Higgs, J, Trede, F & Jensen, G 2004, 'What is collaborative reasoning?', Advances in Physiotherapy, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 70-83. https://doi.org/10.1080/14038190410018938
Edwards, Ian ; Jones, Mark ; Higgs, Joy ; Trede, Franziska ; Jensen, Gail. / What is collaborative reasoning?. In: Advances in Physiotherapy. 2004 ; Vol. 6, No. 2. pp. 70-83.
@article{c930b1b30bab41c99bcc1fa638368ee4,
title = "What is collaborative reasoning?",
abstract = "Most physiotherapists would agree the need to establish effective working relationships with their patients in order to achieve successful outcomes in therapy. Collaboration, as an entity in clinical practice, has continued to increase in importance due to a changing climate of healthcare. Traditional models of physiotherapy treatment based on the medical model and delivered in acute settings are giving way to newer models of practice, such as health promotion, that are patient or client centred and increasingly located in community settings. At the same time, the notion of patient compliance with physiotherapy advice and exercises, deriving from a medical model of practice, is being superseded by the notion of collaborative decision making (or reasoning) in physiotherapy. Recent physiotherapy literature suggests that collaborative decision making is an advanced clinical skill, while also casting doubt on just how well or consistently physiotherapists are able to set goals with their patients and nurture a collaborative approach in working towards those goals. The purpose of this article is to demonstrate how clinical reasoning is an ideal vehicle by which physiotherapy practitioners can reflect on the process of collaboration with their patients in clinical practice. Three particular forms of collaboration are identified which can be traced to different assumptions about knowledge and how this knowledge is both generated and used by practitioners in clinical practice. In this paper, we argue that these different forms of collaboration each have an important role in clinical practice as they address both the diversity and underlying nature of those treatment goals that may be seen as desirable from the perspective of either practitioner or patient. In turn, these forms of collaboration assist in the development of a variety of knowledge and skills for both practitioners and patients alike.",
author = "Ian Edwards and Mark Jones and Joy Higgs and Franziska Trede and Gail Jensen",
year = "2004",
doi = "10.1080/14038190410018938",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "70--83",
journal = "Advances in Physiotherapy",
issn = "1403-8196",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What is collaborative reasoning?

AU - Edwards, Ian

AU - Jones, Mark

AU - Higgs, Joy

AU - Trede, Franziska

AU - Jensen, Gail

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - Most physiotherapists would agree the need to establish effective working relationships with their patients in order to achieve successful outcomes in therapy. Collaboration, as an entity in clinical practice, has continued to increase in importance due to a changing climate of healthcare. Traditional models of physiotherapy treatment based on the medical model and delivered in acute settings are giving way to newer models of practice, such as health promotion, that are patient or client centred and increasingly located in community settings. At the same time, the notion of patient compliance with physiotherapy advice and exercises, deriving from a medical model of practice, is being superseded by the notion of collaborative decision making (or reasoning) in physiotherapy. Recent physiotherapy literature suggests that collaborative decision making is an advanced clinical skill, while also casting doubt on just how well or consistently physiotherapists are able to set goals with their patients and nurture a collaborative approach in working towards those goals. The purpose of this article is to demonstrate how clinical reasoning is an ideal vehicle by which physiotherapy practitioners can reflect on the process of collaboration with their patients in clinical practice. Three particular forms of collaboration are identified which can be traced to different assumptions about knowledge and how this knowledge is both generated and used by practitioners in clinical practice. In this paper, we argue that these different forms of collaboration each have an important role in clinical practice as they address both the diversity and underlying nature of those treatment goals that may be seen as desirable from the perspective of either practitioner or patient. In turn, these forms of collaboration assist in the development of a variety of knowledge and skills for both practitioners and patients alike.

AB - Most physiotherapists would agree the need to establish effective working relationships with their patients in order to achieve successful outcomes in therapy. Collaboration, as an entity in clinical practice, has continued to increase in importance due to a changing climate of healthcare. Traditional models of physiotherapy treatment based on the medical model and delivered in acute settings are giving way to newer models of practice, such as health promotion, that are patient or client centred and increasingly located in community settings. At the same time, the notion of patient compliance with physiotherapy advice and exercises, deriving from a medical model of practice, is being superseded by the notion of collaborative decision making (or reasoning) in physiotherapy. Recent physiotherapy literature suggests that collaborative decision making is an advanced clinical skill, while also casting doubt on just how well or consistently physiotherapists are able to set goals with their patients and nurture a collaborative approach in working towards those goals. The purpose of this article is to demonstrate how clinical reasoning is an ideal vehicle by which physiotherapy practitioners can reflect on the process of collaboration with their patients in clinical practice. Three particular forms of collaboration are identified which can be traced to different assumptions about knowledge and how this knowledge is both generated and used by practitioners in clinical practice. In this paper, we argue that these different forms of collaboration each have an important role in clinical practice as they address both the diversity and underlying nature of those treatment goals that may be seen as desirable from the perspective of either practitioner or patient. In turn, these forms of collaboration assist in the development of a variety of knowledge and skills for both practitioners and patients alike.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4043162839&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=4043162839&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/14038190410018938

DO - 10.1080/14038190410018938

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 70

EP - 83

JO - Advances in Physiotherapy

JF - Advances in Physiotherapy

SN - 1403-8196

IS - 2

ER -