TY - JOUR
T1 - Women With Pregnancy and Lactation–Associated Osteoporosis (PLO) Have Low Bone Remodeling Rates at the Tissue Level
AU - Cohen, Adi
AU - Kamanda-Kosseh, Mafo
AU - Dempster, David W.
AU - Zhou, Hua
AU - Müller, Ralph
AU - Goff, Elliott
AU - Colon, Ivelisse
AU - Bucovsky, Mariana
AU - Stubby, Julie
AU - Nickolas, Thomas L.
AU - Stein, Emily M.
AU - Recker, Robert R.
AU - Lappe, Joan M.
AU - Shane, Elizabeth
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the following NIH and US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) funding sources: R01 AR049896 (to ES), R01 FD003902 (to ES and AC), and K23 AR054127 (to AC). Authors? roles: Study design: AC and ES. Study conduct and data collections: AC, ES, MKK, IC, MB, TLN, EMS, RRR, JML, JS, DWD, HZ, EG, RM. Data analysis: AC, DWD, HZ, RM, EG. Data interpretation: AC, ES, DWD, RM. Drafting manuscript: AC and ES. Revising manuscript content: AC and ES. Approving final version of manuscript: AC, ES, DWD. AC takes responsibility for the integrity of the data analysis.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research
PY - 2019/9/1
Y1 - 2019/9/1
N2 - Pregnancy and lactation–associated osteoporosis (PLO) is a rare, severe, early form of osteoporosis in which young women present with fractures, usually multiple vertebral fractures, during late pregnancy or lactation. In studies of idiopathic osteoporosis (IOP) in premenopausal women, we enrolled 78 women with low-trauma fractures and 40 healthy controls, all with normal menses and no secondary cause of bone loss. In 15 of the affected women, the PLO subgroup, fractures had occurred during late pregnancy or lactation. We hypothesized that clinical, bone structural, and metabolic characteristics would differ between women with PLO and those with (non-PLO) IOP and controls. All were evaluated > 12 months postpartum, when structural and remodeling characteristics would be expected to reflect baseline premenopausal status rather than transient postpartum changes. As previously reported, affected subjects (PLO and IOP) had BMD and microarchitectural deficiencies compared to controls. Women with PLO did not differ from those with IOP in terms of age, BMI, body fat, menarcheal age, parity, or age at first pregnancy. However, women with PLO had a more severe clinical presentation than those with IOP: more fractures (5.5 ± 3.3 versus 2.6 ± 2.1; p = 0.005); more vertebral fractures (80% versus 17%; p < 0.001); and higher prevalence of multiple fractures. BMD deficits were more profound and cortical width tended to be lower in PLO. PLO subjects also had significantly lower tissue-level mineral apposition rate and bone formation rates (0.005 ± 0.005 versus 0.011 ± 0.010 mm2/mm/year; p = 0.006), as well as lower serum P1NP (33 ± 12 versus 44 ± 18 µg/L; p = 0.02) and CTX (257 ± 102 versus 355 ± 193 pg/mL; p = 0.01) than IOP. The finding that women with PLO have a low bone remodeling state assessed more than a year postpartum increases our understanding of the pathogenic mechanism of PLO. We conclude that women with PLO may have underlying osteoblast functional deficits which could affect their therapeutic response to osteoanabolic medications.
AB - Pregnancy and lactation–associated osteoporosis (PLO) is a rare, severe, early form of osteoporosis in which young women present with fractures, usually multiple vertebral fractures, during late pregnancy or lactation. In studies of idiopathic osteoporosis (IOP) in premenopausal women, we enrolled 78 women with low-trauma fractures and 40 healthy controls, all with normal menses and no secondary cause of bone loss. In 15 of the affected women, the PLO subgroup, fractures had occurred during late pregnancy or lactation. We hypothesized that clinical, bone structural, and metabolic characteristics would differ between women with PLO and those with (non-PLO) IOP and controls. All were evaluated > 12 months postpartum, when structural and remodeling characteristics would be expected to reflect baseline premenopausal status rather than transient postpartum changes. As previously reported, affected subjects (PLO and IOP) had BMD and microarchitectural deficiencies compared to controls. Women with PLO did not differ from those with IOP in terms of age, BMI, body fat, menarcheal age, parity, or age at first pregnancy. However, women with PLO had a more severe clinical presentation than those with IOP: more fractures (5.5 ± 3.3 versus 2.6 ± 2.1; p = 0.005); more vertebral fractures (80% versus 17%; p < 0.001); and higher prevalence of multiple fractures. BMD deficits were more profound and cortical width tended to be lower in PLO. PLO subjects also had significantly lower tissue-level mineral apposition rate and bone formation rates (0.005 ± 0.005 versus 0.011 ± 0.010 mm2/mm/year; p = 0.006), as well as lower serum P1NP (33 ± 12 versus 44 ± 18 µg/L; p = 0.02) and CTX (257 ± 102 versus 355 ± 193 pg/mL; p = 0.01) than IOP. The finding that women with PLO have a low bone remodeling state assessed more than a year postpartum increases our understanding of the pathogenic mechanism of PLO. We conclude that women with PLO may have underlying osteoblast functional deficits which could affect their therapeutic response to osteoanabolic medications.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072151639&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85072151639&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/jbmr.3750
DO - 10.1002/jbmr.3750
M3 - Article
C2 - 31348548
AN - SCOPUS:85072151639
VL - 34
SP - 1552
EP - 1561
JO - Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
JF - Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
SN - 0884-0431
IS - 9
ER -