You have the right not to have a hearing

An evaluation of the impact of fully advising civilly committed patients on their rights

Matthew T. Huss, Robert A. Zeiss

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

There have long been calls for the reduction of coercion in treating civilly committed psychiatric patients. The present study assessed whether a minor procedural change intended to reduce the adversarial nature of the treatment process would have a positive impact. Results suggested that the change in procedure had a positive effect for the most direct outcome variables but results were more mixed for the indirect outcome variables. Nonetheless, overall indications were that the change of procedure affected patient outcome.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)334-341
Number of pages8
JournalInternational Journal of Law and Psychiatry
Volume28
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2005

Fingerprint

Hearing
Coercion
evaluation
Psychiatry
indication
Therapeutics

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Applied Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Law
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

@article{4aba2c1a9a3349c99d7bf912d4448341,
title = "You have the right not to have a hearing: An evaluation of the impact of fully advising civilly committed patients on their rights",
abstract = "There have long been calls for the reduction of coercion in treating civilly committed psychiatric patients. The present study assessed whether a minor procedural change intended to reduce the adversarial nature of the treatment process would have a positive impact. Results suggested that the change in procedure had a positive effect for the most direct outcome variables but results were more mixed for the indirect outcome variables. Nonetheless, overall indications were that the change of procedure affected patient outcome.",
author = "Huss, {Matthew T.} and Zeiss, {Robert A.}",
year = "2005",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijlp.2004.09.005",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "334--341",
journal = "International Journal of Law and Psychiatry",
issn = "0160-2527",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - You have the right not to have a hearing

T2 - An evaluation of the impact of fully advising civilly committed patients on their rights

AU - Huss, Matthew T.

AU - Zeiss, Robert A.

PY - 2005/7

Y1 - 2005/7

N2 - There have long been calls for the reduction of coercion in treating civilly committed psychiatric patients. The present study assessed whether a minor procedural change intended to reduce the adversarial nature of the treatment process would have a positive impact. Results suggested that the change in procedure had a positive effect for the most direct outcome variables but results were more mixed for the indirect outcome variables. Nonetheless, overall indications were that the change of procedure affected patient outcome.

AB - There have long been calls for the reduction of coercion in treating civilly committed psychiatric patients. The present study assessed whether a minor procedural change intended to reduce the adversarial nature of the treatment process would have a positive impact. Results suggested that the change in procedure had a positive effect for the most direct outcome variables but results were more mixed for the indirect outcome variables. Nonetheless, overall indications were that the change of procedure affected patient outcome.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=22544488085&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=22544488085&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijlp.2004.09.005

DO - 10.1016/j.ijlp.2004.09.005

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 334

EP - 341

JO - International Journal of Law and Psychiatry

JF - International Journal of Law and Psychiatry

SN - 0160-2527

IS - 4

ER -